To: Bernard Marx
Please explain where/how hes wrong? For the last ten years or so PCR has been touting this crazy theory that commodities don't obey the law of comparative advantage. This he uses as a basis for arguing that we should end free trade. The guy is just nuts. Free trade is our only hope. And the division of labor has no natural borders.
8 posted on
02/24/2009 7:55:57 PM PST by
SeeSharp
To: SeeSharp
Free trade is our only hope. And the division of labor has no natural borders True enough, greed knows no bounds .... So how you like the new Democrat House - Senate and Presidency?
9 posted on
02/24/2009 8:01:09 PM PST by
investigateworld
( Abortion stops a beating heart)
To: SeeSharp
And the division of labor has no natural borders. This makes no sense, borders are man made things to PROTECT the population, nothing natural about them.
12 posted on
02/24/2009 8:14:13 PM PST by
central_va
(Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
To: SeeSharp
For the last ten years or so PCR has been touting this crazy theory that commodities don't obey the law of comparative advantage. This he uses as a basis for arguing that we should end free trade. The guy is just nuts. Free trade is our only hope. And the division of labor has no natural borders.
Free trade is simply not working. Fair trade might, but it has not been tried. The current system of "free trade" is merely a world of parasites sucking the blood out of the Golden Goose....and we are that goose.
Free trade better become Fair trade pretty soon, or the veins will be dry.
18 posted on
02/24/2009 8:31:45 PM PST by
Arkinsaw
To: SeeSharp; Bernard Marx
Evidently you suffer from reading incomprehension.
What PCR has been writing about is international labor arbitrage being passed off as free trade. It only appears nuts if you can’t read.
21 posted on
02/24/2009 8:55:54 PM PST by
Pelham
(Just Doing Jobs Americans Won't Do.- GW Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson