Something-doo economics? Anyone? Anyone? Voo-doo economics?
Posted on 02/25/2009 5:00:03 AM PST by Kaslin
President Obama posed as a fiscal conservative Monday when he hosted a "fiscal responsibility summit."
Close inspection reveals that what he is actually proposing, however, is a massive increase in government debt -- thus raising the already unsustainable burden of government that is certain to fall on our children unless the welfare state is somehow curtailed.
President Obama posed as a fiscal conservative Monday when he hosted a "fiscal responsibility summit."
Close inspection reveals that what he is actually proposing, however, is a massive increase in government debt -- thus raising the already unsustainable burden of government that is certain to fall on our children unless the welfare state is somehow curtailed.
In the first seven fiscal years overseen by the high-spending President Bush, the annual federal budget deficits were truly obscene. Yet, they never exceeded $500 billion.
In fiscal 2002 through 2008, according to the historical tables published by the Office of Management and Budget last fall, the annual deficits were $157.7 billion, $377.5 billion, $412.7 billion, $318.3 billion, $248.1 billion, $162 billion and $410 billion. (The Congressional Budget Office has since calculated that the fiscal 2008 deficit actually ended up being $454.8 billion.)
President Obama said Monday that his "administration has inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit" for fiscal 2009.
The extraordinary size of that deficit is due, of course, to what one would have hoped were passing circumstances and one-time policies: a recession, a $700 billion bailout of the banking industry and that part of the $787 billion "stimulus" President Obama signed last week that will actually be spent in this fiscal year.
"And that's why today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office," President Obama said at his summit.
But what does that mean? The administration says President Obama's promise to "cut the deficit we inherited in half" means he will reduce it from $1.3 trillion in fiscal 2009 to $533 billion in fiscal 2013.
This $533 billion deficit -- that President Obama vows will be the lowest annual deficit he runs in any of the next four years -- is larger than any deficit the profligate President Bush ran before this recessionary year.
In fact, President Obama's planned $533 billion deficit for fiscal 2013 is more than twice as large as the $248.1 billion deficit Bush ran in 2006 and more than three times as large as the $162 billion deficit Bush ran in 2007.
In other words, President Obama is planning to permanently increase the scale of government borrowing -- even before we are hit by the fiscal tidal wave that will come when the bulk of the baby boom generation retires and begins collecting Social Security and Medicare benefits.
The truth is this: Our federal government has been wading ever deeper into red ink for a full half-century, and President Obama is now planning to wade deeper and faster than any president who has gone before him.
According to the Bureau of the Public Debt, the overall federal debt has increased every single year for the past 50 years. The last time it declined from one year to the next was from 1956 to 1957.
Overall federal debt increased even in each year from 1998 to 2001, when the OMB was calculating annual federal surpluses. This seeming contradiction, budget experts tell me, results from the fact that when they calculate the annual surplus or deficit they do not account for the interest the government pays itself on paper for the money it has borrowed out of the Social Security, Medicare and other entitlement trust funds to pay for current expenditures in other government programs.
The interest paid on the money the government has borrowed from Social Security and Medicare taxes to fund other things does not require the government to dole out real cash today. It will require the government to dole out real cash tomorrow, however, when the number of retired people receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits balloons compared to the number of younger working people paying taxes to support those programs.
Every dollar President Obama borrows and spends, like every dollar President Bush borrowed and spent, adds to the permanent burden of government laid on the backs of our children.
Last year, then-Comptroller General David Walker reported that every American household would have to put up $455,000 to cover the $53 trillion gap that already exits between the entitlement benefits promised to living Americans and the tax revenue currently expected to pay for those entitlements.
On top of this, President Obama has just promised to add more than $2 trillion to the national debt over the next four years.
To expand on a metaphor I used in a previous column, America is heading down the blind alley of big government toward the brick wall of national bankruptcy -- and President Obama is now putting his foot on the accelerator. What's next: Liberals will use the coming crash as an argument for even more big government, quite possibly in the form of socialized medicine that seeks to control government spending by rationing the health care of all Americans.
When You’re in a Hole, Quit Digging!
The economy will Not be repaired by stealing money from the very people who create the jobs.
Government efforts to “create jobs”, only results in enlarging the dependent class, while destroying industry and creativity, which are the very engines of a healthy, growing economy.
When the Congress blackmails the banks into making bad loans in the name of “affordable housing”, Congress is the problem, Not the banks!
Giving everybody an insurance card, is NOT providing healthcare! Instead, it drives price controls which guarantee a shortage of Doctors and “productive” research.
Guaranteeing slave wages for illegal immigrants, rather that providing the means to assimilate into American society is far more racist than pretending to “respect their culture”.
The energy needs of America will NOT be provided by ignoring Nuclear Power and telling fairy tales about the potential of wind and solar power.
The nations security is NOT guaranteed by emasculating our Armed Forces and promoting a policy of appeasement.
Disarming American citizens only emboldens violent criminals and makes NOBODY safer.
A culture that devalues life through abortion, euthanasia, and the restricted availability of real healthcare, will never be a culture that retains the moral authority to sustain a free democracy.
Erasing the First Amendment to the Constitution and denying free speech and oppressing religious freedom means America is lost.
In short Mr. President, there are no elements of your speech which can be implemented as advertised and achieve the promised results. Because you are well aware of these facts, the entire speech was a lie!
Debt, Deceipt, and Denial.
bkmk
I find it amazing that he can say contradictory statements in the same breath and none of his cult members are phased in the least.
“I’m gonna let the Bush tax cuts expire, but if you make less than $250k, you won’t see a dime’s increase in taxes.”
Like Rush says, you have to look at everything he says through this lens - he doesn’t really mean anything he says, what he means when he says something is that you want to hear what he’s saying, so he’s saying it.
It reminded me of an elementary school assignment: break up the class into teams, assign them problems, and review at the end of the day, with B Hussein as the third-grade teacher. And it has as much value to addressing issues....
I would call increasing the deficit by 5-6 times the Bush era deficits and then halving them “fiscal responsibility”. For that matter, how can burdening unborn generations with crushing debt that will lower their standard of living so that today’s liberals get to have their socialist utopia be in any way considered “responsible”?
We could start selling off federal lands. Obama could sell Air Force One and go Greyhound - plenty of ways the government could make money and save money! The best way, of course, would be to restrict government to it’s constitutional limits.
But, but, Obama will do it. Just like he provided us with an Earmark Free Stimulus Bill. I feel so good now that we finally have an honest, transparent administration. /sarc
Which one, he has two and I hear they are pushing for three. He could also sell one or more of the 19 helicopters he has at his beck and call. Heck, we're not in as bad a shape as I thought. A Presidential and Congressional Garage Sale could probably erase the Deficit. /sarc
Lie. Most of the $1.3 trillion is the stimulus bill. Passed by a Democrat Congress and he signed by a Democrat President, namely him.
He took the oath of office knowing full well what the situation was. He asked for it and he's got it. Let's at least try to put the responsibility where it rightly belongs.
But, but, butt, the media just loved it, the speech I mean. The points you mentioned went missing. As the follow on poster/commenter says, the whole plan rests on the three D’s. Debt, Deception and Denial.
Debt, Deceit, and Denial.
It doesn’t get any better than this, and the list could go on, but wouldn’t be quite a succinct.
Exactly. Also he ignores that his party has been in charge in the House since January 3, 2007 after they won the majority in the November 2006 election. There was nothing wrong with the economy when the Republicans held the majority. The economy was thriving and unemployment was practically non existent. Now the economy is in tank, thanks to the democRats and unemployment is almost 8 percent. Soon it will be in double digits
Det
De Seat
De Nile
There’s got to be a joke in there somewhere . . . .
Det
De Seat
De Nile = Obama , our first used car salesman prez.
That’s it right there.
Something-doo economics? Anyone? Anyone? Voo-doo economics?
Mr President, part of the reason you inherited this deficit from your predecessor, is because he inherited Al Qaeda from his predecessor.
Not to mention, Obama not only voted for the TARP, he was one of its big cheerleaders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.