Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONFIDENCE IS KING THE SAVAGE TRUTH Best stimulus for America isn't a government program
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | February 23, 2009 | Terry Savage

Posted on 02/25/2009 6:35:03 AM PST by KeyLargo

CONFIDENCE IS KING THE SAVAGE TRUTH | Best stimulus for America isn't a government program, but giving the people a chance

February 23, 2009 BY TERRY SAVAGE Sun-Times Columnist

The foreclosure plan carries many of the same drawbacks as the stimulus bill. Both are full of good intentions and comforting provisions for those who find themselves in financial trouble. Both pay lip service to words like "stimulus" and "incentives."

But in the end, both of these headline programs rely on government to make the decisions, to pick the winners and losers, and to subsidize those solutions with money taken from people who aren't in financial trouble -- yet!

It's easy to blame the markets, and the overwhelming greed of those who profited at others' expense. There is simply no way to defend that kind of behavior. It is an example of human nature at its very worst!

An equally dangerous mistake, though, is to decide that the answers lie with government planning, bank nationalization, congressional control over asset allocation and government subsidies to failing industries.

You don't need a long memory to see how that kind of "planned" economy leads to shortages, stagnancy, and black markets. Central planning was tested to death in the old Soviet Union. A sensible middle

Certainly, there must be a middle ground. Somewhere between the ravages of greed and the monstrosity of government control, we must find the path to get the economy growing again.

It won't happen by pitting Americans who saved and paid off their mortgages, or are still paying, against those who were either greedy or unfortunate enough to be caught in this recession. We can't draw a line and say that on one side are "good" Americans and that those on the other side are "bad." And we can't allow government to determine which is which!

Our economic solutions must be tempered with mercy -- and self-interest! Job loss could have happened to someone in your family, through no fault of their own. The statistic of 5 million out of work includes a lot of hardworking, loyal employees who never expected to end up in this spot.

If compassion doesn't move you, then self-interest should. Insisting on foreclosures when well-intentioned homeowners simply can't pay until jobs are restored is a self-defeating solution. The more foreclosure sales, the lower housing prices will fall. That means even those with jobs can't refinance to pay for college, or sell a home to fund retirement. Growth is the answer

Make no mistake, many of today's problems would solve themselves if the economy could move back to a path of growth:

• • With profitable growth, there would be more demand for workers, less unemployment.

• • With more people employed, there would be more demand for housing.

• • With more income, there would be fewer foreclosures, and home prices would level off and start rising again.

Sadly, economic growth requires more than a huge surge of taxpayer dollars into the slowest areas, like housing and autos, or even banking. The best stimulus is confidence.

But with the best of intentions, the administration's plans seem to introduce more confusion than confidence into the economy.

How can businesses have confidence about investing in the future if they're unsure whether the next government ruling will produce more taxes, or more regulations, or more rules about layoffs or pay levels?

How can individuals feel secure in saving and buying decisions, if government money creation is likely to cause inflation? Or if the rewards of your diligence in saving and paying down your mortgage are offset by taxation that takes your labor to subsidize others who failed to plan? America walking a fine line

America is walking a fine line these days. We are a generous and optimistic people. But our history shows that Americans can only be pushed so far when it comes to taxing their efforts.

The Boston Tea Party was the result of an unpopular tax levied by the British Parliament on tea imported into the colonies. The Stamp Act, requiring a tax to be paid on all legal documents, contracts and newspapers, triggered a revolt because it was passed without representation in Parliament.

Politicians are trying to make it look like it's Democrats vs. Republicans when it comes to debating the economic future. But more and more, it's looking like Americans vs. Congress -- all the politicians, of both parties, who have been digging into the pockets of Americans under the guise of "helping."

When it comes to that confrontation, my bet is on the American people.

And that's the Savage Truth


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bailout; government; mortgages; stimulus

1 posted on 02/25/2009 6:35:03 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Oh so right on! The sad irony of all this “stimulus” idiocy is... our modern economies run only on confidence! With REAL value money (like tied to gold) long gone, confidence is all we have... Sooooo, when G.W. Bush last September, and B.O. today scream “we must do this ‘stimulus’ or die!” it leads to the opposite of the (alleged) desired result... while supplying $pending it destroys the very confidence the economy needs! The first indicator is usually the world stock/financial markets... feel the “confidence”!
2 posted on 02/25/2009 6:51:52 AM PST by FiddlePig (truth is hard... lies are easy - http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Terry is savage to economic idiots. Well written and true.


3 posted on 02/25/2009 7:04:12 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FiddlePig
Their stimulus isn't going to stimulate anything. As a personal example I though I had put away money for my kids college education. Since The One won the election I have lost over $17,000 out of those funds. I had put the money into those funds instead of just burying it in the back yard to avoid the crippling taxes here in Illinois. And lets not even think about my 401K.

So now I have to make up the loss. I face even higher taxes. My company has put raises on hold for this year, and inflation is driving up all my living costs. And since Obama's porkulous bill is crippling the stock market any investments I manage to make will have to be in low yielding investments. So how much do you think I'm going to be spending vs saving over the next eight years?
4 posted on 02/25/2009 7:05:06 AM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson