Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: autumnraine

I am not sure I understand you, can you state this differently. It sounds as though you are saying that Obama does believe in God but he made Randi think that he didn’t.


30 posted on 02/25/2009 11:56:37 AM PST by RipSawyer (I have scant HOPE for the PRESENT absent a major CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: RipSawyer

What I’m saying is that Obama CLAIMED to believe in God. James Randi said he understood that it was just something he had to say as a politician implying that Obama must not really believe in God, but said so because it was politically expedient to say so.

In other words, Obama became the blank chalkboard for an Athiest proving that people project their own desires on Obama.

Phil Plait, the “Bad Astronomer” saw Obama as the “Science President”, that he was going to advance scientifically what all the middle ages Christians want to hold back. (yes, I respect him scientifically, but he is a moron in this respect) So even though Obama has put a non-scientist nincompoop in charge of reducing the cost of NASA, including dropping important programs, he is STILL being hailed as the Science President.

Two prime examples of people hearing what they want to hear and putting their own desires onto the President of Hopenchange.


31 posted on 02/25/2009 12:01:38 PM PST by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson