Ah, to be young again. Thank you so much. Actually, I have read enough of the pleadings to recognize that this case has not been well handled.
Do you judge all with whom you disagree and assault their character and experience?
Courts require that the attorneys before them practice competently, and that is the issue in this case. The court at this point is exasperated.
O- nice little synopsis (sarcastic).
Obviously there is some grating going on (sarcastic).
Now that’s how you got on - leaning right in with the court as here.
Indeed you could not have followed the Donofrio transfer, to come back with such a blithe reply here.
I see another (or 2,3) has asked along same lines of you (61).
I see someone (44) who has been in that courthouse says something perhaps of bearing:
“the USDCDC is a pain in the butt to deal with, uncooperative in many regards.”
What say you to the posts 55-58, 77, 85?
Gosh, i read from a Playboy interview with Saul Alinsky posted on FR recently that he had become Frank Nitti’s favorite -like an adopted son. SA said the mob in Chicago had the courts in their pocket to the point they’d close on the day an entry was to be made against a mobster and that judges were pall-bearers for dead mobsters.
We haven’t gotten there yet but its getting on the verge of being a virtual reality, let’s say.