Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US to withdraw Bush proposal for oil shale leases
Platts ^ | 25 Feb 09 | Derek Sands

Posted on 02/25/2009 6:48:50 PM PST by thackney

The US Department of the Interior will offer a second round of research, development, and demonstration leases for oil shale in Colorado and Utah and withdraw the Bush administration's proposal for expanded RD&D leases, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Wednesday.

"We need to push forward aggressively with research, development and demonstration of oil shale technologies to see if we can find a safe and economically viable way to unlock these resources on a commercial scale," Salazar said. "The research, development, and demonstration leases we will offer can help answer critical questions about oil shale, including about the viability of emerging technologies on a commercial scale, how much water and power would be required, and what impact commercial development would have on land, water, wildlife, and communities."

Interior has submitted a notice to appear in the Federal Register on Friday to ask stakeholders for comments on the lease round. That comment period will be open for 90 days, with a solicitation for the leases to follow.

A previous round of research and development leasing led to six leases in Colorado and Utah.

"This will help us restore order to a process that, under the previous administration, was turned upside down," Salazar said. "We look forward to hearing from the public, industry, and local communities as we move toward offering a second round of research, development, and demonstration leases."

In mid-January the Bush administration's Interior Department announced that it was expanding research and development leases in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, and it finalized rules that laid out how research and development oil-shale leases could be converted to commercial leases.

BUSH LEASES DAYS BEFORE TERM END

BLM estimates that oil shale in western states could hold the equivalent of 800 billion barrels of oil, and proponents have touted the area as the "Saudi Arabia of oil shale." But oil shale extraction has attracted criticism for the massive water-use demands and carbon dioxide emissions that come with its development.

Salazar said he was withdrawing the Bush administration's solicitation on RD&D leases because it included "several flaws, including locking in low royalty rates that would shortchange taxpayers."

The Bush administration offered its oil shale leases just days before leaving office, made the parcels four times the size of the current six RD&D leases, and then locked in low royalty rates and a premature regulatory framework for those leases, Salazar said.

"If oil shale technology proves to be viable on a commercial scale, taxpayers should get a fair rate of return from their resource," Salazar said.

Until results come back from the research and development leases, and the costs and impacts of oil shale use is better understood, Salazar said it was premature to speculate on what royalty rates for commercial leasing would be appropriate.

Salazar said that the department was still reviewing its options regarding commercial oil shale leasing, but that it was important to go forward with research and development leasing.

Before President Bush left office in January, Interior's Bureau of Land Management finalized separate regulations that would govern commercial oil shale leasing on public lands and issued a revised plan opening almost 2 million acres in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to that leasing.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; bhoenergy; energy; oilshale; salazar

1 posted on 02/25/2009 6:48:50 PM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Of course. Continue to deny Americans access to their own energy reserves. Makes perfect ‘Rat sense.


2 posted on 02/25/2009 6:52:39 PM PST by steelyourfaith (How many face lifts were required before the Speaker began speaking from her anal orifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

No need for it, windmills and human flatulence will light the world. Just ask Nazi Pelosi.


3 posted on 02/25/2009 6:56:16 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo (I hear the words of Jefferson louder and louder as each day passes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo

I love your post.


4 posted on 02/25/2009 7:09:50 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo

Sounds like it’s going to be a real stinky world; doesn’t it. Just don’t put me downwind.


5 posted on 02/25/2009 7:10:53 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

10th AMENDMENT!!!


6 posted on 02/25/2009 7:47:12 PM PST by scott7278 (Obama, Klaatu barada nikto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
So, this A-Hole, with a stroke of a pen, can deny the US from up to 300 Billion barrels of oil coming from Oil-Shale.

Yeah, maybe Bush pushed this through in his final days, after being bottled up for seven+ years, but Zer0 has got to recognize that wind turbines,and solar (totally forget about nuclear) will double from 2% to 4% of the power supply!

What a total bunch of idiots, morons, yes-even assholes. But meanwhile Gore tels us that the sea is going to rise by 5 feet!

We must be in the end times, the final times of the earth.

Keep your powder dry!

7 posted on 02/25/2009 7:47:16 PM PST by aShepard (Maybe 12/6 is the time to launch a constitutional amendment that lays out POTUS requirements!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo

Can’t use flatulence, because it leaves too big of a carbon imprint...get your energy use down to the 4% level (on windy days...)


8 posted on 02/25/2009 7:52:04 PM PST by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I guess the dimocrats want the American people to pay higher prices for gas.

Go figure?


9 posted on 02/25/2009 8:11:53 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So, when Bush opens up the oil shale, it’s Bush who did it. When Obama blocks access to the oil shale, it’s the U.S. that did it.


10 posted on 02/25/2009 8:48:49 PM PST by Defiant (If they put Bush in prison, it will let us know which one to storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Then when oil goes back up PERMANENTLY we'll be up $hit creek without a paddle paying $4.75+/gal.

The bleeding heart libs will just bring out the tired argument that it would take 10 years to have new production/supply... well if we start exploring/extracting now we'll be ready to partially break the chains of the Middle East by tapping our own supply instead of being the Middle East's beeeotch... over and over.

11 posted on 02/25/2009 8:55:08 PM PST by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

Salazar Slitherin?
Pick up your weapon and follow me.


12 posted on 03/09/2009 8:18:48 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson