[bitterohiogunclinger]

“contaminates the jury and violates defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial.”
Another attempt to confuse the public that the right to a fair trial, when you clients are obviously guilty, means you have a right to be tried by twelve ghetto hoods that believe in an inherent right to rape and murder. Funny how this only becomes an “issue” when the victims are white and the defendants black. I don't remember much outrage about contaminating the jury pool when a group of lacrosse players were being tried and convicted in the media when they were falsely accused by a black prostitute seeking a “white guilt” payday.
The defendants have a right to a fair trial. The jury and the world have the right to hear the evidence of the crime, the reasons why these defendants are the ones that committed the crime to the exclusion of doubt. And the world has the right to say whatever they feel about it. And, if these are the 5 asshats that did indeed torture and then murder, the death penalty should be swiftly applied.

[Netizen]

And, if these are the 5 asshats that did indeed torture and then murder, the death penalty should be swiftly applied.

Which is why a fair trial, makes sense. Why risk the case with a biased jury?

I'll suggest the same to you as I did for Man50.

Try posting racially inflammatory comments here at FR and see if the mods try to censure you.