Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obammigration Disaster Looms
Right Side News ^ | March 1, 2009 | JB Williams

Posted on 03/01/2009 5:14:42 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: MamaDearest
" Wait until amnesty is given to illegals (certain to happen - first clue was the invitation to La Raza et al in the financial strategy meeting) and conservative talk show hosts are silenced by some sort of legislation (making sure it is NOT labeled "the Fairness Act")."

We don't see any difference that we care much about between the politicians, because the same globalist constituents control nearly all of them and use hordes of third-world slaves to starve their own American neighbors (us).

"Perhaps you mean you don't see a "change" in media reporting, in which case you would be correct. There is no change in the propaganda they spew."

The media are sponsored by the prevailing business interests of today. The money for advertising and control of media outlets does not come from any mystical vacuum of ideas antagonistic to healthier, working class families. Our prevailing, citizen-of-the-world business interests are nowhere near being conservative, although they do fund broadcasts of lies. There are out of touch and do seek to distract others.

That's why there are few important differences between the political parties, although we see much distracting noise and clownishly stupid diversion tactics (see interbreeding within business-government-education families, see Kornbluth's "Marching Morons").


41 posted on 03/01/2009 6:34:07 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: familyop

When did private business become an enemy of free market conservatives?


42 posted on 03/01/2009 6:40:34 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
"salient? Half of the nation wants lower taxes. That would be the half that pay taxes, otherwise known as REPUBLICANS.

The other half of the nation, those who don’t pay income taxes, otherwise known as Democrats, believe that those 'rich folks' are not paying 'their fair share.'
"

Is that intended to be a joke?

The neighborhoods of the rich folks (way less than half) on the other side of the hill from here were bristling with Clinton signs during the '90s. Then they were bristling with Bush signs during the next eight years. Most recently, they were bristling with Obama signs.

I live in the poor County next door to the rich. Most of the recent votes in this poor County were for McCain, but not as many of us voted during the most recent election.

Like I said, read Kornbluth's short story. We're seeing the consequences of national laziness in leadership and the moving of most manufacturing to communist/fascist foreign countries.

And BTW, I work with the third world slaves, doing what they do with picks and shovels and studying design and manufacturing tech. stuff in my spare time, because America will need us in the near future.


43 posted on 03/01/2009 6:44:27 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Salient- 3 a: projecting beyond a line, surface, or level b: standing out conspicuously : prominent ; especially : of notable significance

Yes, I believe I used the correct word to describe the quote that said that most taxpayers are Republicans.
44 posted on 03/01/2009 6:45:38 PM PST by Canedawg (Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Obama is an idiot and so is all of the democratic party if they support a blanket amnesty for illegals because that will only encourage more illegals to come here and take even more jobs away from American workers - UNION workers! Wages will drop even more if that happens and the dem party will be committing political suicide if they dont side with the unions against illegals!


45 posted on 03/01/2009 6:51:45 PM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Where do you live?

In a blue state near one of the bluest districts in the nation maybe?

Don’t make the mistake of thinking the handful of blue districts in the nation represent the nation. Far from it...

Besides, leftists love yard signs and demonstrations, no matter the candidate or cause. Most conservatives do their political talking only in the booth, which is part of the problem.


46 posted on 03/01/2009 6:52:40 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
"When did private business become an enemy of free market conservatives?"

...during the early 1970s, when it started planning and politics for moving our manufacturing base to communist/fascist countries (see "most favored nation," Nixon, Clinton, all). You can ask the likes of Buffet, Gates, and their kind (or any who prefer slaves from other countries while hating their own American neighbors), if you like. As most corporates who use foreign manufacturing and/or imported slaves from other countries, they contribute heavily in various ways to both political parties.

Oil is necessary for freight fuel. For now, oil is a little over $40 per barrel--just over the threshold of war with the Saudis, Russians and a few others. Foreign currencies also had to go down in order for the international games to continue. ...some things to think about.


47 posted on 03/01/2009 6:52:49 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
"Where do you live?

In a blue state near one of the bluest districts in the nation maybe?
"

That's irrelevant. It's common knowledge that Obama received most of the rich support and vote, just as Clinton did.


48 posted on 03/01/2009 6:54:20 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

I can live with that!


49 posted on 03/01/2009 6:54:51 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

And the entitlements are skyrocketing with SCHIP, etc.


50 posted on 03/01/2009 6:58:51 PM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Business operators and private investors are just ahead of the curve. They were the first to be attacked by the American left and therefore, the first to move their primary assets off shore, safe from over taxation and over regulation.

Look at the states with the highest taxes and the most over-reaching regulations and you will find the states with the highest unemployment, deepest fiscal problems and toughest task of attracting employers to their states. Now we have a fed patterned after that model...

Had the government not tried to run private business, private business would have invested in growth rather than in political lobbying in an effort to retain control of their interests under attack.

Blaming business for leaving town once they learned that productivity was no longer to be rewarded in America is like accusing those running from a burning building of being selfish fools....

You have bought into the anti-capitalist drivel. Wait till you live with the only alternative.


51 posted on 03/01/2009 7:02:09 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: familyop

“That’s irrelevant. It’s common knowledge that Obama received most of the rich support and vote, just as Clinton did.”

Totally NOT true! Both received the most INTERNATIONAL funding in US history. Remove the entertainment industry, international socialists and trail lawyers, and neither Clinton or Obama could have won. Neither would have had the money to win.


52 posted on 03/01/2009 7:05:04 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: familyop
These sights will be common all over America.

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Where this...
Photobucket

Becomes this...
PhotobucketPhotobucket

53 posted on 03/01/2009 7:05:40 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I know a lady at the local grocery store who just a week ago received her full US citizenship, the hard way, legally... She is Russian...

She is SO thrilled to be American. She would make a great head of the RNC as she knows why America was designed to be a conservative self-governed representative republic.

But she was shocked and disturbed that of the 60 new Americans at the ceremony, less than five were from Europe or Asia. Over 50 were Middle Eastern Muslims... NOT ONE Mexican!


54 posted on 03/01/2009 7:10:42 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

bttt


55 posted on 03/01/2009 7:31:38 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
The United Zimbabwe State of Amerika. That is what we have and are becoming. The greatest country on God's green earth destroyed in one short election by the Amerikan people.
56 posted on 03/01/2009 7:33:18 PM PST by RetiredArmy (STATES RIGHTS!!!! TO HELL WITH THE MARXIST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
"You have bought into the anti-capitalist drivel. Wait till you live with the only alternative."

There's no capitalist political party for the USA for now, but there will be.

I've learned that honesty is too much to expect from my employers, who are leftists as much as their bureaucrat relatives. They do drugs, gamble, whore around with divorcing/cohabiting ghetto b****es and expect to get their money from the government. They're lazy, and they only compete by way of illegitimate methods--like sending their wives/daughters to screech against new business by complaining about animal migration routes, for example. They hire illegal aliens.

Their family members are in business, government and so-called education. They run fire departments and building development companies while extorting through "impact fees" and blowing the taxpayers' money on gambling, whores, drugs, etc.

Yet, they complain bitterly about their exhausted workers smoking cigarettes or offending false hyper-sensitivities. They throw tantrums like three-year-olds. They seem to get rabid at any hint of rejection of consumerism (which rejection is about to bring them down).

I am a capitalist. I don't do welfare and am preparing to manufacture a few things right here, in the USA, as your globalist/social leftist house of cards falls. ...not to mention the ruralization that we'll see. I don't whine or tell all who are not rich (or poor) to leave my political planning group.

While some of the rich imply in so many publications that they will mount some kind of fascist coup with Euro-flavor, I encourage my neighbors and teach them to do their own repairs, to grow gardens, to build and to form a truly American political party. Because the big shots who steal from them and break their families are about to fall due to shortages of illegitimate, anti-American, anti-capitalist business/government revenues.

You can't squeeze blood from rocks, keep freight fuel low, keep foreign product prices low or have "world peace" forever and ever. The world just won't work that way for you, while you do nothing but maintain bribery/debt accounts from what the PLA produces.

If you want to stay in business for very long, you'll have to appeal to healthy American working men. That means abandoning all feminism (support for universities), offices full o' ho's, other political correctness ("domestic violence in the workplace workshops"), too much television, romantic feelings about foreign countries and the like.

Otherwise, stay out of the business circles that will arise from the fall (what comes after too much pride). The mouths of any illegitimate business competition (fake greenie relatives and the like) will be silenced.

America has seen its limits of tolerance for two political parties that serve only anti-family, anti-American, big government, big corporate interests. And you can see that my limit of tolerance for those pathologies have also been crossed.

See you in the elections of 2016. We will likely have more than effeminate, politically correct, foreign-interest, talking figureheads in office then.


57 posted on 03/01/2009 7:40:34 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
"These sights will be common all over America."

Those sights were already coming to America before January. We've been going that way since the bipartisan planning phase of the early 1970s. Nixon's people started it, and Clinton's people finished it. I assume that you will agree with the sentiments behind the following observations and words if not with the anecdotes (anecdotes not easy for proud people to accept).

Most employers would consider my appearance and behavior as being threatening or offensive. I'm over 6 feet tall, healthy for my age, fair, honest in speech, truly conservative (including family matters) and hard working. Their wives and daughters leer at and flirt with me. When I ignore such behavior, those family members hate me for being "unflappable" (e.g., word of one Arkansas University PhD. feminist and daughter of an asphalt company family). I act like an American man who also deserves certain reasonable levels of respect when earned.

What I'm getting at is the truth that we cannot have "fiscal conservatism" (not a pursuit of either political party) without moral conservatism.

The Democrat putsch to raise taxes on the rich is very wrong, but so is giving so many billions of dollars to foreign offices like AIGFP in London (AIG) and foreign production facilities like those of General Motors. Both kinds of government welfare are as wrong as seductive, large debts for liberal arts students who will produce little of value for us.

And as for unions, I haven't seen a union for men for about 30 years. Meanwhile, the unions for teaching and other women's jobs are upheld by both political parties and most of their important constituents. Way back then, we didn't have a choice against being trapped between the spoiled, drunken, philandering "right-to-work" bosses and lefty union managers--even in right-to-work states. And I had no respect for the individuals on either side. You can take that as an employee majority opinion of that time (all that I heard from most).

As for the Republican Party now looking for ever more support from the libertine, remember that anarchists (now libertarians) have historically only cleared the way for communists and fascists.


58 posted on 03/01/2009 8:15:28 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
"Totally NOT true! Both received the most INTERNATIONAL funding in US history. Remove the entertainment industry, international socialists and trail lawyers, and neither Clinton or Obama could have won. Neither would have had the money to win."

See the current international efforts of political business leaders: citizens of the world. They're not trailer trash.


59 posted on 03/01/2009 8:17:28 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

No denying that now!


60 posted on 03/01/2009 8:21:57 PM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson