Starr is one of the best lawyers in the country. This joke they have up against him wouldn’t stand a chance in a federal court (possibly excluding the 9th Circuit), though you never know with the California Supreme Court.
Californians are not allowed to amend their Constitution if it takes away an "inalienable" right (which thought, by itself, is completely correct!). So if the CSC decides homos have an "inalienable" right to marry each other, then the Prop 8 amendment is unconstitutional, and invalid.
Of course, the fact that it completely alters the many thousands of years of Stare Decisis that viewed marriage as between a man and a woman means nothing to these people. It's time to fix what ain't broke!
This is how they do it, folks. This is how they use legalistic maneuverings to get what they want shoved down our backs.
Push is coming to shove. Very soon!
I wonder if it'd have gotten this far were it called homo marriage, rather than 'same-sex'? And is this really an 'issue' we should be spending so much time (and money) on?
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com
Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights in San Francisco, is a transsexual who spent his first 35 years as a female. He was a lead counsel in the state Supreme Court case decided last May that allowed same-sex couples to marry, a ruling that was reversed in November when voters approved Proposition 8.