I have always owned GM cars. Their build, design, and quality have always been superior. The only expenses I have had with over 100k on each of them, has been brakes, tires, and oil changes.
Nothing has fallen off, dripped out, or just plain broke. Except a cup holder that I pushed the wrong way.
I am not saying Ford isnt as good, but I havent had problems with GM cars.
I still fail to understand why any conservative would buy anything made by any union when they know that the money is going directly to funding anti-conservative causes and politicians. I steer clear of the union label for this reason, as well as quality issues.
I have had problems, so I guess that means their consistency is not good.
Either.
“Their build, design, and quality have always been superior.”
I’d have to say that’s a matter of either luck or opinion. I used to have a Chevy and it needed a new electrical system after 37,000 (how convienent as that’s right after the 3/36 warranty). My husband’s friend has been a GM guy all his life and finally caved when he bought a brand new Duramax truck that needed a new tranny after only 300 miles, then again at 25,000. His wife just got put new brakes and rotors on her 6 month old Equinox.
Not to mention their vehicles, along with Chrysler and Ford, have nothing but cheap plastic interior. $25,000 for plastic. It’s s shame.
I won a Dodge Avenger, unfortunately and it’s the same deal-junk quality, junk engineering, junk design.
These vehicles are not made with pride or exception. They are union junk, mass-made to get a quick buck.