Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank
"—permanent sterilization for any individual recipient of government funds-—"

Just for starters, why restrict this to divididual recipients? How about all the guys at AIG, GMAC, American Express, Chrysler, CIT Group, and PNC Financial Services Group?

3 posted on 03/02/2009 10:14:06 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Inquiring Minds Want to Know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
---in the dreamworld which I would envision, there would be no distribution of "government" funds to those entities you mention--
4 posted on 03/02/2009 10:20:18 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o
It seems the number of childless women interested in parenting her children would be very low.

This writer's an ideologue with an anti-birth agenda, period. Although, to be fair to the either ignorant or disingenuous (or both) person, if Ms. Suleman's children were adopted by some sane people with jobs, they would no longer be "her" children: they would be the adoptive parents' children.

5 posted on 03/02/2009 10:26:58 AM PST by Tax-chick ("There are more enjoyable ways of going to Hell." ~ St. Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson