a. An incompetent doofus or...
b. Determined to preside over an economic collapse of historic proportions, in service of his radical socialist agenda.
Given his biography, both options are eminently plausible.
There are no other realistic interpretations, are there?
I’m leaning toward b.
That was right after I said that in three different posts yesterday.
All I can really say about Gibbs is that he's not as swift on his feet as he ought to be and he has problems reading the big words on the teleprompter ~ you know, "a", "and", "the" ~ that kind of thing.