Posted on 03/03/2009 7:19:10 PM PST by Man50D
First I’m not your friend.
Second you argument becomes circular.
Third, I agreed with Keys tnen and I agree with him now.
If Orly Taitz says it, it must be true! Especially when she says it to WorldNutDaily.
/sarcasm
It is claimed that Regulation 138 of The Uniform Code of Military Justice allows for some forms of criticism of superiors.
You and a few others keep ignoring one thing about the pledge... the Oath "to Protect and Defend the Constitution" comes first and it was put there by the founders for a very specific reason; governments can become corrupt, and when they do, the Consitution gives very specific power to "The People" up to and including replacing the government.
When a government attempts to subjugate it citizens then it is up to EVERY single solitary American Citizen (including military members) to make the decision... is this constitutional.
Also in that oath is a pledge to obey the orders of the officers appointed over them.
and that would be false, "to knowingly violate the laws, rights, Blah, Blah following the orders of a superior officer, ignorance is no excuse... Blah, Blah and is punishable...blah... blah... blah"
The Secretary of Transportation used to be in charge of the Coast Guard, before it was moved to Homeland Security a few years ago.
Send them to Leavenworth, that’s where they belong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.