Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
The press was hounding Brownback over his decision.
Saying something, at this point, actually kept the issue from getting elevated any further.
I am sure that Brownback consulted prolife leaders prior to his announcement.
154 posted on 03/05/2009 8:12:38 AM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

The correct answer when one doesn’t want to answer the press is “no comment,” or, more constructively “we’re studying the issue closely” (or “in depth,” or whatever other thoughtful and indefinite adverbs one cares to append...).


156 posted on 03/05/2009 8:16:08 AM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
The press was hounding Brownback over his decision.
Saying something, at this point, actually kept the issue from getting elevated any further.

Then he should have either said he didn't support her or no comment, it's not like the press actually expected him to endorse her.

I am sure that Brownback consulted prolife leaders prior to his announcement.

Funny, NONE have come out to support him, though several have lambasted him for it.

160 posted on 03/05/2009 8:23:57 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson