To: GodGunsGuts
Although some creationists do say that “there are no transitional fossils,” it would be more accurate to state that there are no undisputed transitional forms. Although the article asserts that the fossil record “is full of them,” the reality is that it does not contain a single universally accepted transitional form.And by disputing and refusing to accept the transitional forms, the cretionists provide their own evidence to support the assertion.
4 posted on
03/04/2009 7:21:44 PM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
The acceptance of every transitional fossil requires finding two more.
7 posted on
03/04/2009 7:28:23 PM PST by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: tacticalogic
And by disputing and refusing to accept the transitional forms, the cretionists provide their own evidence to support the assertion
Maybe you missed this - "Every transitional fossil candidate has both proponents and doubters even among evolutionary “biologists and paleontologists.” "
85 posted on
03/04/2009 9:42:39 PM PST by
GLDNGUN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson