1 posted on
03/09/2009 4:52:12 PM PDT by
Oakleaf
To: Oakleaf
How you look at that bill depends on whether or not someone intended to impose it on churches (clearly unconstitutional and a cause for tarring, feathering and hanging the guilty legislators), or would it be a voluntary means to protect valuable assets from predatory lawsuits.
I have no doubt there are constituents in SW Connecticut who would vote to hang every Catholic from a yardarm, which makes me kind of wonder why those legislators sought to blame them. Is this the start of an ethnic war?
2 posted on
03/09/2009 5:00:10 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Oakleaf
spokesman for McDonald said the matter is a committee bill, and the concept's original language came from concerned constituents in lower Fairfield County.Well, let's put that to the test. I'm a "concerned constituent in lower Fairfield County."
So, what do I have to do to get my wording into a committee bill that will be taken up by the Democrat-infested judiciary committee?
I won't hold my breath...
3 posted on
03/09/2009 5:10:39 PM PDT by
Zeppo
(Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
To: Oakleaf
In my archdiocese, the archbishop put all the individiaul church properties into trusts or something like that so that money mongers could not attach them.
Hmmmm.
4 posted on
03/09/2009 5:17:18 PM PDT by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: Oakleaf
One more step to making Christianity illegal in this country. We had better fight back now or the basic foundation of this country will be lost.
JoMa
5 posted on
03/09/2009 5:21:14 PM PDT by
joma89
To: Oakleaf
Who is Healy?
The link doesn’t work.
To: Oakleaf
I was born in Connecticut, lived there 9 days. I never had an urge to return to the land of my birth. Now I have a strong urge to not go to that whole part of the country.
12 posted on
03/09/2009 6:33:44 PM PDT by
arthurus
( H.L. Mencken said, "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson