Posted on 03/10/2009 3:00:35 AM PDT by Rummyfan
Jake Tapper appears to be one of the few (only?) mainstream reporters keeping current on the Chas Freeman story. You would think it would be hard to ignore the growing tidal wave of protest and controversy. The latest is a letter signed by the Republican members of the Senate Intelligence Committee taking issue with the appointment. And one wonders how the civil libertarians on the left who are apologizing for Freeman and smearing his critics will respond to this from Huffington Post:
One new development, revealed here for the first time, which is likely to further damage Freemans already battered standing is that the former ambassador advocated creating a national identity system in the US as a part of the war on terror. During a 9/11 Commission interview, Freeman remarked that of three major changes the US government should make to effectively combat terror, one was that the United States should implement a national identity system, so we better know who is who.
This all raises several questions. First, how long can the rest of the mainstream media hold out without reporting on an embarrassing debacle for the Obama administration? This is the John Edwards story on steroids a virtual conspiracy of silence with little if any journalistic justification. And here the issue is really important the appointment of a key intelligence official who is alleged to harbor serious conflicts of interest and extreme views. I have made inquiry at two prominent, national newspapers about the lack of coverage and have received one Ill pass it on from the ombudsman and only an automated response acknowledging receipt from the other. I wonder how mortified theyll be if the story comes and goes, causing greater public controversy and embarrassment for the administration with nary a report from them.
Second, where are the Democrats on the Intelligence Committee. Does Diane Feinstein think Freeman is an acceptable pick? It is interesting to note how lacking in whats the word? ah yes oversight the government is now that Congress and the White House are controlled by the same party. Imagine if George W. Bush had nominated someone whose earnings depended on the largess of the House of Saud or who advocated crushing Chinese dissidents indeed faster than the Chinese government.
And finally, one has to wonder whats going through the minds of the president and his top team. Is the Freeman choice the sort of unpoliticized advice they are looking for? One suspects eventually they will retreat. In the meantime, they have alienated former supporters who took their campaign promises seriously, put the Congressional Democrats in a tough spot and revealed themselves either to be horrendous vetters or lacking sound judgment. Or perhaps, if they prolong this, both.
ON THE INTERNET:
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/chasfreeman
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/freeman
“...one has to wonder whats going through the mind... of the president...”
I’ll give you a hint, it makes this neat “hoooooooo” sound when you blow it over the mouth of an empty bottle.
We have a president who never realized the job was HARD before he took office.
National Identity Card? Why? We cant even ask for Identification when we vote ,might Offend someone .
Leninists tend to make Marxists uncomfortable.
We had all best stock up on dried beans and ammo.
No real surprise here. Zero, the communist, is appointing one of his own.
Being President is hard."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.