Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orson Scott Card: Big Love? Big Deal
National Review Online ^ | March 13, 2009 | Orson Scott Card

Posted on 03/13/2009 11:25:57 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: greyfoxx39; restornu
Can some one explain to me what is meant by New Puritan Americans of the left?
The term was posted by restornu. Anyone anyone at all.......
41 posted on 03/20/2009 7:14:30 AM PDT by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Placemark

Why?

It appears that this thread is dead!

42 posted on 03/20/2009 7:38:00 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

It appears that this thread is dead!

____________________________

Blood Atonement ?????????????????


43 posted on 03/20/2009 7:40:42 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: svcw; Elsie; Tennessee Nana
Can some one explain to me what is meant by New Puritan Americans of the left?

The use of the term directed at me was another insult as usual. Be prepared to have that same vile term used against anyone rebutting mormon claims to be the "only true church".

Orson Scott Card had this article on the subject yesterday.

Are new 'Puritans' gaining?

Here is an excerpt:

A fanatical religion -- one that does not proselytize so much as insist that it is already the established church, to which all others must bow and make way.

It is a religion at war with all others, confident of victory, contemptuous of any church that does not fight them, savage against any that shows a sign of resistance.

Its adherents feel themselves to have risen so far above all other faiths that they claim they are not a religion at all -- they are post-religious. Therefore the rules that govern the behavior of other religions in a multifaith society do not apply to them.

They refuse to admit that they even exist. Instead, they claim to believe in "science," though they have no idea what the methodology of good science is, and reject the findings of science when they contradict treasured dogmas.

Having no authoritative group to define their ideology, they embrace opposite and contradictory dogmas and simultaneously believe in all. Their doctrines spread like dandelion seeds on the wind, taking root wherever there is empty ground.

Has there ever been such a religious movement as this before?

A very good example is Puritanism in the 16th and 17th centuries

Another interesting statement from Card's article is this: "With all our missionary work, we Latter-day Saints merely managed to keep pace with population growth in America, remaining at a steady 1.4 percent of the population. In fact, Mormons were the only group to show no change at all, relative to the America as a whole. We're swimming as fast as we can -- just to stay in place."

44 posted on 03/20/2009 7:41:51 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Recession-Your neighbor loses his job, Depression-you lost your job, Recovery-Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: svcw; restornu
Can some one explain to me what is meant by New Puritan Americans of the left? The term was posted by restornu. Anyone anyone at all.......

Yes, those who check off on surveys as atheists or don't know religious affiliation: "...the New Puritans embrace a hodgepodge of dogmas drawn from feminism, environmentalism, gay activism and militant atheism.

See http://www.mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/orson_scott_card/?id=6793

45 posted on 03/20/2009 8:16:19 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Oh, that makes more sense. I thought it was a back handed insult implying that I was a sexually repressed legalistic Bible thumper.
I'm Sicilian can't be sexually repressed and don't subscribe to legalism in any form.

46 posted on 03/20/2009 8:20:11 AM PDT by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

The definition alone is hysterically funny. (and tragically sad that ldsers believe anyone who disagrees with them must be from the left.)


47 posted on 03/20/2009 8:22:11 AM PDT by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson