Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Krodg
it is a little complicated, and it is only based on my own personal experience, but here goes.

You are right that there is impairment, no matter the agent causing it. I found that, driving in residential or otherwise regular roads, there didn't seem to be an impairment, or at least the impairment was much less than if drunk. Where I found the impairment was on a Freeway, where the tendency was to drive slow, despite the effort to maintain 60 MPH.

I'm sure there are studies that would explain the difference between the impairments as between alcohol and MJ. I'm also certain there is a difference, a difference that is meaningful in terms of damage and safety is concerned.

Please do not take my comments as condoning any form of impaired driving, I do not. I just wish to explore the fact that there is a difference.

BTW, My experiences are 30+ years old so they are somewhat dated.

60 posted on 03/14/2009 3:21:33 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: TCats

There’s also a difference between a “seasoned” pot smokers perceived impairment from pot (and also the level of impairment depending on the quality of the pot)and person who only occasionally smokes pot.

A person who rarely smokes pot gets so stoned they can barely function, never mind drive a car.


66 posted on 03/14/2009 3:39:23 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson