Skip to comments.
Minnesota legislators tell California: We don't want Sara Jane Olson
StarTribune ^
| 3/16/09
| Paul Walsh
Posted on 03/16/2009 10:04:32 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Nope. Don't her 'round here...
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Send her to GITMO, never mind she’d have more rights.
2
posted on
03/16/2009 10:07:32 AM PDT
by
boomop1
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Let her live in Washington D.C., Detroit, or New Orleans.
3
posted on
03/16/2009 10:07:55 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
(I went to America and all I got were some DVDs and little helicopters.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
“We might take a couple of the Guantanamo detainees off your hands, but not this woman who was living a quiet life as a soccer mom in Suburbia, no way...”
4
posted on
03/16/2009 10:08:20 AM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Send her to Chicago. They like Domestic Terrorists.
5
posted on
03/16/2009 10:08:49 AM PDT
by
autumnraine
(Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
To: Abathar
What are you thinking????????????
6
posted on
03/16/2009 10:10:26 AM PDT
by
Carley
(President Obama ~ Leaving No Tax Cheat Behind)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
All criminals are now “terrorists”, except for AQ, of course.
7
posted on
03/16/2009 10:11:10 AM PDT
by
Redgirl
(You get your torch and I'll get my pitchfork.)
To: Redgirl
Her “crimes” were not simple criminal acts.
8
posted on
03/16/2009 10:12:40 AM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
To: Abathar
Certainly not this woman who changed her name and hid for years to avoid prosecution and run away from her crimes.
Tell me you’re missing a sarc tag, please.
9
posted on
03/16/2009 10:13:19 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: Colonel_Flagg
I apologize, I thought it was self evident.
10
posted on
03/16/2009 10:16:21 AM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Abathar
Thanks! I had hoped so ... the Red Star’s comment pages have more than a few people who could use a talking-to.
11
posted on
03/16/2009 10:18:29 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
even if she converted to Islam in prison and changed her name to something somalian.? gees.. rough crowd. ;-)
12
posted on
03/16/2009 10:19:16 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I’ll be glad to let her stay on my property.
In fact, I’ll start digging the shallow grave this afternoon....
13
posted on
03/16/2009 10:19:44 AM PDT
by
Mac from Cleveland
(How to make a small fortune in the Obama era--first, start off with a big fortune....)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
“Her crimes were not simple criminal acts.”
Charlie Manson was not called a “terrorist” back in the 70’s, even though his crimes were heinous.
14
posted on
03/16/2009 10:20:12 AM PDT
by
Redgirl
(You get your torch and I'll get my pitchfork.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Opposition is growing today in Minnesota to allowing 1970s terror figure Sara Jane Olson to return home to St. Paul after she completes her seven-year prison sentence Tuesday in California for attempting to kill police officers and participating in a murderous bank robbery. State Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen, R-Alexandria, and a counterpart in the Minnesota House, Laura Brod, R-New Prague, are preparing a resolution for introduction today that urges California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to require Olson to serve her parole in California.
It takes Republicans to bring up concerning issues however sadly enough, we historically and presently a DFL run government here.
Welcome back (I'm sure) will be in order for SJO.
15
posted on
03/16/2009 10:20:45 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: NormsRevenge
Yeah, we’re all waiting for Keith Ellison to poke his nose into this one......
16
posted on
03/16/2009 10:22:47 AM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
To: Redgirl
You want her? You may have her.
17
posted on
03/16/2009 10:23:50 AM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Yeah, were all waiting for Keith Ellison to poke his nose into this one...... If he does then perhaps a "zapper collar" for her with the 5th district as the boundary would be appropriate then.
18
posted on
03/16/2009 10:28:57 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, Question everyone else)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
No thanks. The left coast can keep her. The illegals keep me occupied here.
I was just pointing out the current trend of labeling serious criminals as terrorists.
19
posted on
03/16/2009 10:34:01 AM PDT
by
Redgirl
(You get your torch and I'll get my pitchfork.)
To: Redgirl
She was labeled a terrorist in the 70’s......
20
posted on
03/16/2009 10:35:18 AM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson