[MinnesotaLibertarian]

The rightful concern is that they - those seeking to destroy marriage - CAN succeed, possibly, for a time, even though, in time, the resulting society will fail; and fail possibly because of their temporary success.

I don't see how you can believe that without believing that a majority of society are closeted homosexuals. How else could it destroy marriage?

[Wuli]

Again, the crux of the philosophy is not necessarily “pro ‘gay’”; the same arguments can, and most likely will, be used to support legalized polygamy and legalized ‘group’ marriage down the road. Added together with modern in-vitro fertilization, legalized adoption as a “right” to any single, or conjoined set of “responsible” adults, and regardless of the number of “gays”, heterosexual “singles” are, already, and more will be offered legitimacy to any “committed” relationship, sans traditional marriage.