Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DirtyHarryY2K

The first idea sounds good to me - that’s what I’ve always suggested should be done. Marriage is a religious institution and there’s no reason for the state to get involved.


6 posted on 03/17/2009 5:22:27 AM PDT by MinnesotaLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MinnesotaLibertarian
The first idea sounds good to me...

Then go live in the hell hole that California would surely become if something like this were to pass.

8 posted on 03/17/2009 5:28:27 AM PDT by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian; DirtyHarryY2K; fwdude; All
"The first idea sounds good to me - that’s what I’ve always suggested should be done. Marriage is a religious institution and there’s no reason for the state to get involved."


9 posted on 03/17/2009 5:34:30 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

Yep, just go ahead and play into their hands, why don’t you?

The goal is the destruction of the traditional, nuclear family.

I used to be libertarian, until I realized that apathy in the face of advancing evil was dangerous and destructive to liberty.


14 posted on 03/17/2009 6:29:26 AM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

You could always work it the other way round. During the period of English history known as the interregnum, the radicial puritan republicans made marriage into a completely secular institution. It was actually illegal to get married in a church.


20 posted on 03/17/2009 8:39:49 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian
Marriage is a religious institution and there’s no reason for the state to get involved.

No. Marriage is not a creation of the church or the State. Marriage is a social institution deemed to be a postive influence on society as a whole. As such, the Government chose to recognize and encourage it by providing certain benefits/incentives.

Replacing marriage with "domestic partnerships" is nothing more than an attempt to destroy the nuclear family, IMO.

24 posted on 03/17/2009 11:10:39 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson