Compromise with evil produces evil, so it's always a tough call how much evil one is willing to tolerate. How could they remain "right all along" while simultaneously compromising with those who are dead wrong?
This article seeks parity in search of supporting a stupid premise of moral equivalence where there is none. There is nothing in a parliamentary system that precludes National Union from cooperating with Habayit Hayehudi, so what's the big problem? As things are, there are two voices for the media to marginalize and ignore instead of one.