Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge dismisses Ind. suit challenging Obama
WNDU.com ^ | March 17, 2009 | The Associated Press

Posted on 03/17/2009 9:29:35 AM PDT by Stayfree

A judge in Indianapolis has dismissed a lawsuit claiming that Barack Obama is not eligible to serve as president.

The suit, like some others that have failed in federal courts, questioned whether Obama meets the constitutional requirement that the president must be a "natural born citizen."

(Excerpt) Read more at wndu.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: birth; certificate; obama; reward
Since our judges won't help us uncover the truth...we are taking a new approach. We have set up a new website, Reward for Obama's Birth Certificate.com, asking patriotic Americans to help amass a huge reward (and public awareness of the issue) for anyone who can produce a valid birth certificate which proves Barack Hussein Obama's "real" citizenship. And we mean the long form that contains detail birth info, signatures, etc...not the meaningless document put forth by Obama's people!!!
1 posted on 03/17/2009 9:29:36 AM PDT by Stayfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

Pres_ _ent-Elect-for-Life, the Imperial, King Obama:
"It is agreed. Let the word go forth quietly. All investigators shall be silenced.
The Constitution will be as dead as that fool John Jay.
We were not here, and this ex parte meeting never happened."


2 posted on 03/17/2009 9:36:05 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree
Sorry, neglected to provide this direct link:

Reward for Obama's Birth Certificate.com
3 posted on 03/17/2009 9:36:29 AM PDT by Stayfree (The Obama Disaster.com has all the latest reasons why Obama shouldn't be President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

ping ‘22’


4 posted on 03/17/2009 9:37:29 AM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

I wholeheartedly suggest you IMMEDIATELY go purchase the “domain privacy” option for your domain name that does NOT allow anyone to know who you are.

Seriously.


5 posted on 03/17/2009 9:40:43 AM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree
I found this sentence the most interesting: Judge David Dreyer dismissed the suit yesterday, ruling it was moot and that plaintiffs Steve Ankeny, New Castle, and Bill Kruse, Roselawn, waited too long to file their claim.

I don't believe that the Constitution specifies a eligibility qualification period, and without having read the actual judgement, it appears to me the judge is making this supposed debility up whole cloth.

6 posted on 03/17/2009 9:51:50 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree
From Opensecrets.org:

Candidate: Obama, Barack

Contributor: DREYER, DAVID INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46208

Employer: STATE OF INDIANA/LAW

Date: 9/16/08

Amount: $250

7 posted on 03/17/2009 9:52:15 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

We are compiling a list of news articles and other info to put on the website which will help inform those who are not aware of the issue and why it has not yet been resolved. We also will be including more detail info about the bank trust account and the worthwhile causes who would receive the reward money in the event that no valid birth certificate comes forth.


8 posted on 03/17/2009 10:02:46 AM PDT by Stayfree (The Obama Disaster.com has all the latest reasons why Obama shouldn't be President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

While I like your tenacity, I am not sure that you are not exposing yourself for criminal prosecution with this effort. Seek advice of a good lawyer ( I know, those two words look funning together.. LOL ), and very soon.

Remember, you better not have any chinks in your armor. The Obama team is formidable, well funded, and take personal joy in the complete destruction of private citizens— with no less glee than those that would savagely cut off our heads...i.e ‘Joe the plumber.’


9 posted on 03/17/2009 10:13:38 AM PDT by Gator113 (For America to Survive, Obama Must Fail..... Obama=Failure in Chief with the Audacity of Dope.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

If only we had an AMERICAN President!

Say it loud, say it PROUD:

O ne

B ig

A ss

M istake

A merica!


10 posted on 03/17/2009 11:02:44 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

The ONLY reason to seal a birth certificate is after an ADOPTION. The “orginal” certificate would have been sealed when his name was changed to Soetoro at the same time he became an adopted son of an Indonesian citizen.


11 posted on 03/17/2009 12:37:06 PM PDT by RasterMaster (DUmocrats - the party of slavery, sedition, subversion, socialism & surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree; Salamander

What she said.

Seriously.


12 posted on 03/17/2009 3:41:33 PM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Can some one please tell me who has standing to challenge that in court?


13 posted on 03/17/2009 3:51:35 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Apparently no legal authority exists to assert proper standing, although I would posit that the U.S. Supreme Court could entertain a petition by the Solicitor General to invoke its own jurisdiction to hold its own hearings on the matter of standing, if not other points of law related to the entire issue as to the vetting process of compliance with Article II, Section1, Clause 5..


14 posted on 03/17/2009 4:33:09 PM PDT by Stayfree (HELP US EXPOSE THE "REAL" BIRTH CERTIFICATE @ REWARD FOR OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.COM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson