I support biblical (traditional) marriage.
That said, I have never bought into the “for creating children” argument. That would mean that those who are sterile or past childbearing years shouldn’t marry, which I don’t think is true.
That said, I have never bought into the “for creating children” argument
Globalist & Marxist in particular hate the idea of children and family units. In fact the ultimate extension of “equality” or rather “egalitarianism” and by extension multiculturalism is to destroy it all. That which makes us strong and stands in the way of the global “utopia”. They hate biological families(race) which begets strong communities which begets strong nations. Since the beginning of mankind family units which leads to real communities and ultimately a nation has always been our strength. The ultimate goal here so that we can all be “equal” is to have no religion, no race, no gender, no families(easy divorce and heavily promote abortion)& ultimately no nationalities. We can all good little worker widgets and consumers that have no ties or bounds except to the global concept of “everyman” & “equality”.
Marriage between one man and one woman is based on the "reproductive model". That doesn't mean a married couple must have children together. It means that only a man and a woman CAN have children together. Only a man and a woman can procreate.
State marriage laws always mention children. Yes, some couples are deemed unlikely to bear children, while others plan not to have children. But, sometimes those couples unexpectedly DO have children. And, in the event that they do, their biological family unit is protected by the legally recognized institution of marriage.
OTOH, two people of the same sex can never procreate.
You support the Bible and Genesis first, then you reject it?
"What's he that is not born of woman?"(Macbeth, act V, scene VII)
Not for 'creating' children but for raising children.