Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Race OK as factor in enrollment, court says
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/17/9 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 03/17/2009 7:21:24 PM PDT by SmithL

SAN FRANCISCO -- A state appeals court breathed new life Tuesday into campus integration efforts, ruling that Berkeley does not violate California's ban on racial preferences when it considers the makeup of students' neighborhoods in deciding where they will go to school.

Berkeley's policy "does not show partiality, prejudice or preference to any student on the basis of that student's race," said the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco. "All students in a given residential area are treated equally."

The ruling is the first by an appellate court on a school district's voluntary integration plan since California voters passed Proposition 209 in 1996, prohibiting preferences by race or sex in state and local education, employment and contracting.

The case could be heading for the state Supreme Court for a decision on whether Prop. 209 forbids any consideration of race in government programs. The court interpreted the initiative broadly in a 2000 contracting case, its only ruling on Prop. 209, but did not say it whether it prohibited all government programs aimed at promoting racial diversity.

Alan Foutz, a Pacific Legal Foundation attorney representing a nonprofit organization that challenged the Berkeley program, said his client would probably appeal to the state Supreme Court, though no final decision has been made. He said the ruling "undermined (Prop. 209's) mandate for colorblind educational policy by allowing districts to continue using race in (their) student assignment decisions."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; berkeley; beserkeley; highereducation; lawsuit; preferences; prop209; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: SmithL
...the makeup of students' neighborhoods in deciding where they will go to school.

This is "reverse red-lining". No joke. Any honest court would see this.
Good luck finding one.

21 posted on 03/17/2009 11:00:28 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Katya
Just move into a low-scoring predominately minority district to gain easy entrance to an otherwise unattainable school.

There may be a much higher demand for slum homes ... buy one just before sending in your child's application to UC Berkeley, get in based on "diversity", and sell it to someone with a kid graduating the next year. It could boost housing values in the worst slums of California, while making the racists in the UC system feel good about themselves. It's still stupid, but at least it's fun stupidity.

22 posted on 03/18/2009 5:47:35 AM PDT by TurtleUp (Turtle up: cancel optional spending until 2012, and boycott TARP/stimulus companies forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

These “Judges” are the ultimate COUNTER-intellectuals!


23 posted on 03/18/2009 5:58:39 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson