Such great intellect you must have......must be something special in the water in.....Ohio?.....that leads you to think you know ANYTHING about someone else based on the State they live in.
So, just to be clear, a 4 y.o. child would be better off continuing to live in a horrific Russian orphanage full of disease and malnutrition...then getting kicked into the streets at 14 years old, if they haven’t ran for the streets already.......than to live in a upper-class (as in...making well over $500K per year) house in the United States that happens to have 2 homosexuals in it. The 4 y.o. malnurished kid came with 4 diseases.......and all his brown teeth were immediately taken out because they were all rotted and weak due to a lack of calcium.
You going on record that he would’ve been better in those circumstances in Russia? Riddled with disease, malnutrition, and destined for a life on the streets because heterosexual couples simply are not adopting them?
REALLY?
You going on record to say we should throw kids to the wolves I addressed in previous posts on this thread just because the two rich perverts you mention set the standard for homo adoption?
REALLY?
Heh - My, my. You do bandy the trashy hyperbole around with little restraint, don't you?
Benn to Russia much? No?
But yet, you do present your posits as factual.
You are simply regurgitating nonsense and presenting it as a priori fact, much like any liberal MSM NYT editorial columnist might in pursuit of their agenda for change.
Your use of such descriptive terms, especially to defend, if not promote, a lifestyle that is nothing short of cultural suicide via a deviant perversion, is demeaning to our intellect.
Begone.
What you say MIGHT be true except for one FACT:
There are more than enough heterosexual, married couples in America and Europe who are willing and financially able to adopt these children.
We shouldn't support the lesser of two evils when it comes to children and social engineering. There are PLENTY of GOOD and even GREAT opportunities, at lest thus far, for children in this country. Why accept anything less for innocent children? DO they not have a right to be raised in a wholesome healthy environment? Suggesting those environments are not available is not true, and never has been.
“[b]So, just to be clear, a 4 y.o. child would be better off continuing to live in a horrific Russian orphanage full of disease and malnutrition...then getting kicked into the streets at 14 years old, if they havent ran for the streets already.......than to live in a upper-class (as in...making well over $500K per year) house in the United States that happens to have 2 homosexuals in it. The 4 y.o. malnurished kid came with 4 diseases.......and all his brown teeth were immediately taken out because they were all rotted and weak due to a lack of calcium.[/b]”
Ah, the “false dilemma” angle... Nice!
Tim-