To: ElectricStrawberry
Proof: I stood in the orphanage in Russia and saw the 100 or so kids (ages 0-13.9) that people are not adopting, talked with the volunteers running the orphanage....and their policy is to kick 'em into the streets (well over 90% of 'em), uneducated, disease riddled, and malnurished. Prior to that, I stood in multiple Russian prisons where these kids end up and took Tb samples from former orphanage residents....teenagers that will die in prison for petty theft.
Again, that's not proof. It's your unverifiable claim.
But this is all irrelevant to the question posed by this article. Not surprising as the purchase of children by rich homosexuals is something that's difficult to argue *for* unless you create absurd scenarios.
If the homosexuals procuring these children really had the kids' best interests at heart, they'd bring them to the US and help a willing heterosexual couple adopt them.
59 posted on
03/19/2009 12:55:10 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(So now "change" is defined as "more of the same, but worse"?)
To: Antoninus
see my article from the florida bar news.
The family law section was prohibited from lobbying this issue in the legislature and it died there.
The lawyers in the family law section have been pushing this homosexual access to children and snuck the amicus brief permission past without any publicity or opportunity to comment.
now there is an objection before the FL supreme court over using the “florida bar” name to promote this.
60 posted on
03/19/2009 1:03:18 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson