Skip to comments.
Lawyer ORLY TAITZ: Clerks withheld Obama citizenship case from justices?
The Rollye James Show ^
| March 18, 2009
Posted on 03/19/2009 8:25:46 AM PDT by SloopJohnB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
To: SloopJohnB
HEY TIM GEITHNER, WHO WAS YOUR “INDONESIAN FRIEND” THAT YOU TRAVEL TO INODESIA WITH IN COLLEGE?
61
posted on
03/19/2009 1:44:02 PM PDT
by
AJ in NYC
(Liberals are ill-mannered children)
To: SloopJohnB
62
posted on
03/19/2009 2:05:16 PM PDT
by
Semper911
(When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
To: SloopJohnB
You know, I mailed in a letter to SCOTUS asking them to investigate whether Obama was actually a natural born citizen, as is required by the Constitution. I’m now thinking maybe they didn’t even presernt it to the Justices and instead trashed the letter.
To: MrB
.... and she is a dentist too!
To: AJ in NYC
INDONESIAN FRIEND THAT YOU TRAVEL TO INODESIA WITH IN COLLEGE?Please adumbrate.
65
posted on
03/19/2009 2:33:25 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunk
(The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Orly is merely showing her ignorance of how the Supreme Court works. As I pointed out at the time her cases were calendared for conference before the Supreme Court-- and got flamed for doing so-- the fact that a case is listed for conference doesn't mean it actually gets discussed. Every case filed with the Supreme Court gets listed for conference. That means dozens and dozens of cases are listed for conference on the same day. (Check the Supreme Court's on-line docket and you will see.) Before the conference, each Justice circulates a list (not made public) of which cases they want to discuss. Any case not put on the "discuss list" by any Justice is never discussed and is denied automatically, even though it was listed for conference. So it is no wonder that Justices don't seem to remember Orly's cases-- all were denied without a single recorded dissent, which means they most likely were not discussed. (Again, I pointed this out on FR at the time, and got flamed for saying so.) Orly's claim about the docket being manipulated is also false-- every one of these cases is on the Supreme Court's on-line docket, with all proceedings and filings properly recorded. One case was off-line for one day because of a computer glitch, but was back the next morning. QFT.
Remember though that tin-foil blocks out reason.
To: All
DR. ORLY TAITZ_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please go to Dr. Orly's website http://defendourfreedoms.us/ and contribute to her PayPal. This lovely little Russian refugee is working herself to exhasution to save YOUR country. It is reported that she is surviving on 3-4 hours sleep per night and is bearing much of the expense of her lawsuits herself. She is asking for lawyers, researchers, letter writers and other volunteers. Please do what you can to help her.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson