According to Greenburg, it wasn't the contracts AIG held that were all bad rather they had too many contracts to cover when they were required to put up additional equity for the contracts due to the downgrade... all the Fed really needed to do was act as a backup guarantee to AIG on the contracts. Instead AIG received TARP and then funneled the money through to the chute to satisfy equity requirements -- many of which were foreign banks.
Those of you in favor of lynching AIG had better think seriously about that. In your zeal to "get 'em" , you may be shooting yourself in the foot.
Just another thought. Your employer, your kids' schools, your favorite mall and other commercial ventures may suddenly find themselves without insurance, and forced to suspend operations, when AIG goes. No one is big enough to take on all of AIG's risk in those markets.
Personally when I hear the words ‘too big to fail’ I think monopoly. If there is a monopoly...then there is a legal consequence.
If there was to be any bailouts etc. it should have come from the bankruptcy court system. The courts should have never ever been circumvented. Even now, much of this could be stabilized by turning matters over to the bankruptcy courts for reorganization. Congress trying to do this with the tactics their using is fascism in my opinion.
Rally up anger towards these people, they are not trying to save their company, their just running away with our tax money...c’mon. It is all propaganda. The more I watched this today the more I believe AIG is a prop, an excuse, and is being abused as a means to a more sinister end. Poor useful idiots.
>>Congress has no business in the compensation business... <<
Hell, Congress has no business being in the Congress business!!