1 posted on
03/20/2009 4:13:26 PM PDT by
SandRat
To: Clive; girlangler; fanfan; Mrs. Don-o; 91B; HiJinx; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.
WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!
2 posted on
03/20/2009 4:14:01 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: SandRat
Yes, we will indeed be attacking the scum at a higher frequency.
3 posted on
03/20/2009 4:18:18 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: SandRat
This is a call to arms. It was going on before Iraq, has continued, and will continue until the area has been (what’s the word? “Sterilized?”)
4 posted on
03/20/2009 4:22:27 PM PDT by
Monkey Face
(I've had amnesia as long as I can remember.)
To: SandRat
they know whom they are dealing with now, the same party that guaranteed failure in Viet Nam, once violence is escalated against our soldiers and the anti war crowd once again becomes vocal, obama and his cohorts will turn tail and run.
To: SandRat
The number of attacks in Afghanistan is likely to rise with the influx of additional U.S. forces there Thats ok. Our guys shoot back.
This is a peculiar article. We're increasing our troops by 50%, which means we'll be killing significantly more Talibs. But the hand-wringers act like we're the ones in trouble.
I don't think so. The Talibs already don't live long after they cross the border. They'll be dying in greater numbers and in less time. Its a win win.
6 posted on
03/20/2009 4:58:27 PM PDT by
marron
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson