Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neocon1984
Eventually slavery was going to end and the South’s economy would have to adapt.

That's actually a myth since the 1860 Census showed that planters were actually transitioning their slaves over from the cotton and tobacco fields to the nascent industries, especially mining, that were beginning to take root in the South, about twenty or thirty years behind the North.

52 posted on 03/21/2009 10:59:52 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I think you misunderstood my point.

(1) Slavery was going to end because of growing moral concerns in the US and elsewhere. The South would have been forced, through diplomatic means and trade sanctions, to make that change. It would have been nice if John Brown and others had not so inflamed passions that people (e.g., Robt. E. Lee) felt that the morally correct choice was to defend their state (i.e., Country). Under the same circumstances, I may have made the same decision as General Lee.

(2) With the end of slavery, the South needed to adapt it’s labor intensive practices in favor of more mechanized processes. It doesn’t matter if it’s farming or mining or whatever.


56 posted on 03/21/2009 12:22:30 PM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson