Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York, NY - State Bureaucrats Fight Doctor's $79 Flat Fee for Uninsured
http://www.vosizneias.com/28392/2009/03/04/new-york-ny-doctor-trying-to-help-uninsured-patients-with ^ | 3/22/09 | anon

Posted on 03/21/2009 11:43:25 PM PDT by genghis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: genghis

This sounds exactly like a retainer.

Does that mean that lawyers are charging for legal insurance?


41 posted on 03/22/2009 5:53:27 AM PDT by chrisser (The Two Americas: Those that want to be coddled, Those that want to be left the hell alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genghis

Somebody needs to get this Doc an award for free market capitalism..and common sense. His critics need an enema.


42 posted on 03/22/2009 5:56:28 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
The difference: when billings exceed the retainer, you get charged the difference. This is exactly the issue raised by the doctor's service. If he gets more than the expected number of accidents or illnesses, he will go broke. And his patients will be left high and dry.
43 posted on 03/22/2009 6:00:10 AM PDT by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
The doctor is not being an insurance agency, he's being a one-man, limited-coverage HMO.

The insurance companies and bureaucrats can't afford to have this catch on. Otherwise the next step would be comprehensive group practices doing the same thing. The step after that would be for people to only have catastrophic hospitalization insurance, plus a yearly plan with their local doctor/group.

44 posted on 03/22/2009 6:01:05 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

which will do away with any need for a national health care system


45 posted on 03/22/2009 6:02:57 AM PDT by Gone_Postal ("Men who say it cannot be done, should not interupt those doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Why is there a law that prevents this doctor from doing this?

Who is John Galt?
46 posted on 03/22/2009 6:06:40 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
If he gets more than the expected number of accidents or illnesses, he will go broke. And his patients will be left high and dry.

Or he will have to change his rates, or not retain patients with chronic conditions (For this to work, the doc has to have the option of not renewing a patient who has a chronic condition at the end of the year).

For other patients, it is reasonable to assume that illnesses and accidents will be fairly evenly distributed over the year, and that this month's payments can be used to cover this month's expenses.

47 posted on 03/22/2009 6:19:45 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
Government officials are becoming more unhinged by the tminute.

Key observation.

It is because There's few limits to their authority. The presumption of enumerated powers of government is pretty much gone. Many officials, from the local queen bee at the town hall to the State and Federal bureacracies, feel that if they say it, its the law unless some other more influential politician or agency says otherwise. If you don't like it, tough... go to court and fight government paid drone lawyers... with the high costs and lengthy delays. Good luck in anything but the clearest cases, because of the politicization of the courts, too. And, for the official... the consequences of a reversed decision are minimal.

48 posted on 03/22/2009 6:23:39 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

You have described an actuarial (insurance math) solution. I think NY State is being foolish. But it is an insurance-type product.


49 posted on 03/22/2009 6:28:19 AM PDT by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: genghis
"How can the state dictate you've got to charge more?"

Easy, the state is a dictatorship and can do whatever it wants. We gave them that power one slice at a time over the last 200 years. Maybe it's time to take it back.....

50 posted on 03/22/2009 8:29:09 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

But it’s not single payer and according to DU the ONLY way to fix all our health problems is single payer.

So obviously this guy has to be stopped...


51 posted on 03/22/2009 9:58:11 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson