Posted on 03/25/2009 12:51:48 PM PDT by Rufus2007
In this market I would not put up with that crap. In fact in any market. Move up the food chain till you can find someone who can walk and talk at the same time. Or go to the corporate hot line. Time to Bitch!
I have no idea, that's news to me. If they did, were any of the new deal programs revoked as a consequence? If they weren't revoked (and I can't think of any that were) then ruling something unconstitutional without enforcing the ruling is mere grandstanding without any substance and we the people have no redress of grievance. If I'm wrong and some of those new deal programs were stopped by the courts, then yeah, the courts would be the way to go providing you can find a judge that still adheres to the constitution.
I thought that within our system, only courts can declare some law or some action unconstitutional. If courts will say someone lacks standing to bring the lawsuit, then our goose is cooked.
That's what has been happening all across the country regarding Obama actually proving his eligibility - no standing, cases dismissed without ever looking at the merits. Result? Citizens have no redress of grievances. The last time this happened in our country was in the 18th century and ultimately led to revolution (among other things).
IMO the American people are going to have to come to grips with the reality that our country is on a death spiral down into the abyss of some sort of distorted mix of faschism and marxism and do something about it before Obama gets his civilian army in place to stop us. The reality is we had better lock and load, get off the internet, and start planning the first battle while we still can.
This is why everything this clown does has been IN A HURRY!
“CHANGE” everything as fast as possible and “HOPE” it gets done
before everyone wakes up.
Well at least if the have on uniforms, we know who to shoot at. Otherwise who’s the target?
Just sayin’
Half of congress is infested with seditionists.
FDR expanded and stacked the court with justices who were friendly to his unconstitutional new deal.
He knows the Constitution better than anyone alive today! GOD bless Mark!
LLS
FDR tried to expand the court after some of his New Deal initiatives were rejected by the Supremes. The Senate rejected his plan to appoint an additional Justice for each sitting Justice over age 70 1/2.
Old thing? Why, don't you know that it is a living breathing document? It is, it's........ THE BLOB!!!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are correct, he tried. He did, however, stack the court. He appointed 5 justices in his second term alone and a few more in his third term.
Did the total sitting ever exceed nine?
As far as I know, no. Replacements.
Right on Right on Right on. As Rush would say. Add Ingraham as attorny general and Malkin for Homland Security.
I had a liberal coworker defend BHO, stating that BHO was a constitutional lawyer! So is Mark Levin. What then is the difference?
BHO studied the Constitution to learn how he can destroy it, while great men like Mark Levin studied the Constitution to defend it from useful idiots like BHO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.