[ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY]

You two seem to think that discussing weaknesses takes many hours of time; a few minutes (less than 10) is what happens.

I assume y'all never discussed the problems with Einstein's theory of relativity, nor talked about Nicolai Tesla's competing theories, nor the ..

I suppose since you had an impoverished education, you want everyone else to also.

Something you dogmatic Darwinists just don't get is ID is NOT antithetical to evolution; it merely states that Macro-evolution cannot happen by pure chance alone!!! It makes the proposition that some other, as yet undiscovered, natural law governs the process. (Yes, it also means that we have a CREATOR! Which is the main reason it is an anathema to the Darwinists.)

[MrB]

The implications of a Creator are... well... deadly.

[allmendream]

Yes, faith just simply isn't enough to those of weak faith and weak minds who attempt to PROVE God in the laboratory, or indicate that HIS province is merely the “gaps” in our knowledge.

Heb 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Heb 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

No need to “seek” God, or to have “faith” in “evidence of things not seen”; if you have ironclad “proof” (in your own mind at least) that the natural world needs the supporting hand of God to exist.

[sometime lurker]

I assume y'all never discussed the problems with Einstein's theory of relativity, nor talked about Nicolai Tesla's competing theories, nor the ..

Not in an introductory high school class, no.

Something you dogmatic Darwinists just don't get is ID is NOT antithetical to evolution; it merely states that Macro-evolution cannot happen by pure chance alone!!! It makes the proposition that some other, as yet undiscovered, natural law governs the process. (Yes, it also means that we have a CREATOR! Which is the main reason it is an anathema to the Darwinists.)

I'm not against learning about a Creator. I entirely approve of it - taking place in a church or synagogue or from one's parents. Or even in a comparative religion class. Not in a science class, which studies the natural, not the supernatural.