I know, dummy. I didn’t say it was. Read what I actually write instead of just going off.
In Post 8, 1believer wrote "If a police dog barges into your home and you shoot the dog in self defense that is considered murder of a police officer."
In Post 26, I wrote, "If you shoot and kill a dog, police dog or not, you will not be charged with murder. You cannot legally “murder” a dog. Murder is the unlawful taking of a human life. A dog ain’t human."
Then you wrote in Post 28, "It will be for killing an officer. There are special laws that make police dogs ‘officers’. Such laws are only in place in certain areas of the US, not country-wide."
You stated that "it", refering to the charge, would be murder. If not, what the hell did "it" refer to. You aren't suggesting a dog is human are you? What does "it" refer to if not the charge of murder?
You cannot murder an animal. A dog is an animal. You cannot murder a dog. See how that works, dummy?