Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Carve it any way you want, Andrew. GGG’s statements still reek of Islamic apologetics to me, lifted almost verbatim from the words of an Islamic apologist. If you adopt another’s opinion as your own and reiterate it, “association” is a fair inference.

And the issue is, in fact, whether Islamic terrorism is the product of the supernatural irrationality that prevails in those contemporary societies that practice it or, as GGG asserts, the product of the western scientific rationalism that prevails in those contemporary societies that actually reject it.

And you still haven't addressed whether you agree with GGG's assertions.

117 posted on 03/31/2009 7:43:19 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: atlaw; AndrewC; GodGunsGuts

“If you adopt another’s opinion as your own and reiterate it, “association” is a fair inference.”

“And you still haven’t addressed whether you agree with GGG’s assertions.”

DON’T DO IT, ANDY!!! IT’S A SETUP!!!

By your logic, outlaw... I’d be afraid to agree with you if you said the sky were blue for fear someone might think I was a radical, faith-based evolutionist.


119 posted on 03/31/2009 7:52:16 PM PDT by Gordon Greene (www.fracturedrepublic.com - Jesus said, "I am THE way, THE truth and THE life." Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: atlaw; AndrewC; CottShop; Thunder90; Tailgunner Joe; editor-surveyor; betty boop; metmom; ...

==And the issue is, in fact, whether Islamic terrorism is the product of the supernatural irrationality that prevails in those contemporary societies that practice it or, as GGG asserts, the product of the western scientific rationalism that prevails in those contemporary societies that actually reject it.

See reply #109 for a pretty fair assessment of where I stand re: the roots of Islamic Terrorism. I don’t agree with every word, but it is a good launching pad for a serious discussion of the same.

All the best—GGG


120 posted on 03/31/2009 7:56:51 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: atlaw; GodGunsGuts
GGG’s statements still reek of Islamic apologetics to me, lifted almost verbatim from the words of an Islamic apologist.

So? Convince others that GGG lifted the words instead of being "convergent evolution". Darwinists should be adept at tap dancing around logic. In any case, it would still be red herring.

And the issue is, in fact, whether Islamic terrorism is the product of the supernatural irrationality that prevails in those contemporary societies that practice it or, as GGG asserts, the product of the western scientific rationalism that prevails in those contemporary societies that actually reject it.

No it isn't. You injected Islam into a thread about Texas education standards.

And you still haven't addressed whether you agree with GGG's assertions.

And I won't since your red herring has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. If you wish to start one on the principles of Islam, you are free to do so.

123 posted on 03/31/2009 8:01:30 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson