Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC

Thanks, AC. I knew about Yahya long before Mr. Lawyer brought him up, but I don’t base what I think about Islamist terrorism on his writings. He’s a bit wacky here and there re: masonic conspiracies, etc. I merely pointed out (only after Mr. Lawyer brought it up and tried to put words and intentions in my mouth) that the growing Islamic creationist movement is good news for the War on Terror because they tend to oppose the same terror tactics that we do.


96 posted on 03/31/2009 5:37:12 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts; atlaw
Thanks, AC. I knew about Yahya long before Mr. Lawyer brought him up,

Well, that still does not justify a guilt by "association". I own several copies of "The Origin of Species", a copy of "Das Kapital", and "Manifesto of the Communist Party". I must be really guilty.

98 posted on 03/31/2009 5:47:32 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: GodGunsGuts

[[Thanks, AC. I knew about Yahya long before Mr. Lawyer brought him up, but I don’t base what I think about Islamist terrorism on his writings. He’s a bit wacky here and there re: masonic conspiracies, etc.]]

NO need to explain GGG- And NO need to apologize for garnering info from Huryan when that info is spot on correct either- His views on other issues bears absolutely NO weight on those evidences he does present which happen to be correct- The evidences REFUTING Macroevolution stand on their own weight, and have stood the test of time- not to mention the silly malignings and ad hominem attacks agaisnt hte messenger, and there’s absolutely no reason to explain anything-

the whoel point of the matter is that this ‘guilt by association’ is NOTHING but a diversionary tactic perpetrated by evos when the FACTS and evidences are too much for them to handle- citing evidences no matter whom those evidences coem from does NOT align oneself with the author- Atlaw knows this- but the evidences lsited by Huryan apparently are too difficult for atlaw to tackle, so his only recourse is to attack both you and Huryan in hopes that peopel will forget that the evos stumbled over the evidences and couldn’t refute what was said with any credible coutner evidneces. Huryan has many great points about ID and IC that evos treat as though were kryptonite, and apparently their only recourse is to rabbit trail the topic- derail it at all costs- I’ve seen htis time and tiem again- infact most threads on FR abotu creation or ID or IC get derailed in like manner- with hte evidences NEVER being discussed by the evo crowd-

Apparently Macroevolution is in such terrible shape these days that derailing threads is the only way to ‘defend it’ anymore


126 posted on 03/31/2009 8:15:00 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson