Please tell me this is satire... $1 is way
too much compensation for that imposter!
Wish it was a joke. Another O.J. jury.
Yes it is, but the jury asked the judge if they could give $0. The judge replied the minimum was $1.
No, not a joke - read the article. The jury asked the judge if it was possible to find for Churchill and award him $0 in compensation.
The judge told them basically “no, you must give him a minimum of $1 if you are going to find in favor.”
This is the jury’s way of slapping Churchill in the face. It is 100% certain that he will find out that they WANTED to give him ZERO in compensation, and know from it that they all thought him a complete POS.
What the jury ALSO effectively did is prevent Churchill from launching into a continuous cycle of appeals, abusing the courts and costing the University further monies.
They found in his favour - he cannot appeal that. Nor can he appeal the monetary award. The jurors very smartly (IMHO)prevented any further legal actions from this phony indian.
Not an “OJ jury” by ANY stretch of the imagination.
A.A.C.
Churchill winning means he cannot bring the case to court again. $1 means that the jury felt he is a jerk.
Maybe they’ll tax it at 90%
Remember, his attorneys will get at least a third of that.
Perhaps; but, after taxes he gets .66.
Then comes the real justice: windfall taxes. ;^)