Only problem here is that it is pretty comprehensively clear that Stevens is indeed guilty of major corruption. Everyone in Alaska has been fully aware of this for decades. He was an active member of the culture of corruption Sarah has been fighting.
Whether his conviction has been tossed out on a technical ground has nothing to do with whether he is worthy of representing the GOP in the Senate.
He isn’t. I’m very glad he’s gone.
I have found the opposite to be true. I believe the 'clarity' you speak of is exactly what this author is speaking of ("global warming is R-e-a-l!").
This charge was bogus. The charge was not discarded for a technicality. The whole process stunk. I do not know about other ethics issues. I have not been a fan of Stevens for his pork spending. Even though this charge was bogus, Stevens should have dropped out of the primary. He knew this charge would hurt his chances for election. At his age, he should have bowed to the greater good to keep the rats from taking the seat.