Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Companies Loath to Follow Obama’s Green Lead
New York Times ^ | April 7, 2009 | Jad Mouawad

Posted on 04/07/2009 1:20:41 PM PDT by reaganaut1

The Obama administration wants to reduce oil consumption, increase renewable energy supplies and cut carbon dioxide emissions in the most ambitious transformation of energy policy in a generation.

But the world’s oil giants are not convinced that it will work. Even as Washington goes into a frenzy over energy, many of the oil companies are staying on the sidelines, balking at investing in new technologies favored by the president, or even straying from commitments they had already made.

Royal Dutch Shell said last month that it would freeze its research and investments in wind, solar and hydrogen power, and focus its alternative energy efforts on biofuels. The company had already sold much of its solar business and pulled out of a project last year to build the largest offshore wind farm, near London.

BP, a company that has spent nine years claiming it was moving “beyond petroleum,” has been getting back to petroleum since 2007, paring back its renewable program. And American oil companies, which all along have been more skeptical of alternative energy than their European counterparts, are studiously ignoring the new messages coming from Washington.

“In my view, nothing has really changed,” Rex W. Tillerson, the chief executive of Exxon Mobil, said after the election of President Obama. “We don’t oppose alternative energy sources and the development of those. But to hang the future of the country’s energy on those alternatives alone belies reality of their size and scale.”

The administration wants to spend $150 billion over the next decade to create what it calls “a clean energy future.” Its plan would aim to diversify the nation’s energy sources by encouraging more renewables, and it would reduce oil consumption and cut carbon emissions from fossil fuels.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; anticapitalist; bho2009; bho44; bhoenergy; blameamericafirst; democrats; drillheredrillnow; energy; first100days; globalwarmingscare; greenfraud; greens; obama; oil; pravdamedia; renewable; rewewableenergy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: businessprofessor

Yeah Salazar is thinking about campaign donations....from wind and solar entities....


21 posted on 04/07/2009 1:52:19 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The Obama administration wants to reduce oil consumption, increase renewable energy supplies and cut carbon dioxide emissions in the most ambitious transformation of energy policy in a generation.

The author of this NY Times piece, Jad Mouawad, chose the wrong adjective to describe the Obama regime's policy prescriptions. If he had wanted to write honestly, what he should have written is:

The Obama administration wants to reduce oil consumption, increase renewable energy supplies and cut carbon dioxide emissions in the most foolish transformation of energy policy in a generation.

22 posted on 04/07/2009 1:52:31 PM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BornToBeAmerican

Not yet, anyway.


23 posted on 04/07/2009 1:57:28 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Looks like Hussein will have some brand new companies to take over when he gets back.


24 posted on 04/07/2009 1:57:33 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

of course they like to make a profit. I guess Obama will have to offer them federal support to keep them profitable.


25 posted on 04/07/2009 1:58:29 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

wind is about 50 times more expensive per khw than coal and would need huge taxpayer subsidies


26 posted on 04/07/2009 1:59:21 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marron
Thanks for the reminder. It was just assumed, it was a truism without a shred of evidence that Bush/Cheney took millions of $ in kickbacks from oil companies.
27 posted on 04/07/2009 2:06:56 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Islam is a barbaric social and political system in religious drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

A recent study said 80 percent of wind generation must be backed up via fossil fueled generation. In Texas, the figure was > 90 percent.


28 posted on 04/07/2009 2:07:03 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

wind and solar are unreliable and unpredictable. You cannot run a grid that way.


29 posted on 04/07/2009 2:11:10 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Even as Washington goes into a frenzy over energy, many of the oil companies are staying on the sidelines, balking at investing in new technologies favored by the president,

Oh really. Well then, a bailout is in order, apparently. Then, like with the mafia, you'll do whatever we say--or else.

30 posted on 04/07/2009 2:12:02 PM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

“Bambi’s energy secretary said wind could replace 3000 coal fired power plants.”

And,, it will only take 3 trillion windmills to do it. Green jobs!


31 posted on 04/07/2009 2:25:49 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
I didn't see in the story any mention of the fact that the Seven Sisters have been sitting on all the profits from last year's price per barrel spike.

They don't need the Fed Nationalizers to move in and "save" them. Big Oil has been perfectly happy passing along locally mandated 'boutique' gasoline prices to the consumers, and keeping the profits to plow back into leases, and rigs, and non-union people.

You might also notice how many of the Big Oil Companies can move headquarters overseas in a heartbeat. They are perfectly willing, and can afford, to sit out The President of Crazyville's self induced financial disaster. Amazing how spending 100 years bribing Third World dictators prepares Big Oil for dealing with this White House...

Oil exploration and production has always been a cash on the barrelhead business. Oil men don't like playing financial games. Our Chicago Shyster-in-Chief may find it hard to grift and blackmail people who aren't stupid and greedy.

32 posted on 04/07/2009 2:46:13 PM PDT by jonascord (Hey, we have the Constitution. What's to worry about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Maybe if the wind is biden and hussein lighting their farts live on larry king.

LLS


33 posted on 04/07/2009 3:01:24 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jonascord
Our Chicago Shyster-in-Chief may find it hard to grift and blackmail people who aren't stupid and greedy.

Doesn't need to. Cap & Trade anyone? When Brrack gets done with his green initiatives (read OVERTAXATION) the oil companies will be crying uncle. Brrack will be looking out for the children, the environment and the world.

Oil companies don't need the money for a bailout? The mob has ways of MAKING you need the money, then they own you.

Sorry to say it.

34 posted on 04/07/2009 3:02:04 PM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
They are not American companies any longer and they will just sell their oil to other nations... we will be left high, dry and without. They will tell hussein to go **** himself.

LLS

35 posted on 04/07/2009 3:10:45 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Of course not.


36 posted on 04/07/2009 3:54:13 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; subterfuge
They are not American companies any longer and they will just sell their oil to other nations... we will be left high, dry and without. They will tell hussein to go **** himself.
37 posted on 04/07/2009 5:29:54 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; subterfuge
They are not American companies any longer and they will just sell their oil to other nations... we will be left high, dry and without. They will tell hussein to go **** himself.

You've got it right. With China coming on line with gas powered cars, all the oil companies have to do is offer a discount to them to establish new markets. The citizens of this country will be walking or driving motor scooters or that ridiculous 2 wheeled motorized wheel chair GM is touting and India and China will be driving SUVs and Pick up trucks! However, as soon as we are conquered by China after we throw away our nukes, we will be able to drive gas powered cars again also!

38 posted on 04/07/2009 5:30:11 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: calex59
The chicoms will find Mississippi a bit hard to conquer but I understand exactly what you are saying. The more pain that fans of American Idol feel, the sooner we will be rid of this muzzie/marxist. The only problem is good people like FReepers will feel the pain also.

LLS

39 posted on 04/07/2009 6:17:09 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

HEADLINE: “Oil Companies Loathe To Waste Money, Unlike Obama!”


40 posted on 04/07/2009 7:26:01 PM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson