Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SLB

“The burden of proof is on the state.”

Umm...isn’t that one of our chiefest principles?
Innocent until proven guilty?


9 posted on 04/08/2009 6:17:43 AM PDT by dsc (A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dsc
“The burden of proof is on the state.” Umm...isn’t that one of our chiefest principles? Innocent until proven guilty?

Not in the case of affirmative defenses. In most states if you are trying to use "justification" as an affirmative defense against a murder or assault charge, the burden of proof is on you to show you were justified in committing what would otherwise be a crime.

The essence of the affirmative defense is: "Yes, I committed murder by killing that man, but I was justified in doing so because..."

That's the most important element of any "Stand Your Ground" or "Castle Doctrine" law - the legal presumption in favor of the self-defender, turning self-defense from an "affirmative defense" to a "presumption of innocence."

If your legislators are trying to pass such a law without that presumption in favor of the self-defender, they need to fix the bill.

14 posted on 04/08/2009 7:07:09 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson