Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FarRockaway
Who the *&^% cares why she was denied?

You should because she was most likely denied because her claim lacks credibility.

The lady has multiple written threats, from multiple family members, that she WILL be killed if she returns to Pak, because she works as a hairdresser.

Your are assuming that an asylum applicant would never falsify evidence. She has had her due process in one of the most liberal immigration systems going (Canada) and she could not even convince them.

Sorry but I have read too many of these one sided immigration sob-stories not to cast a jaundice eye at the onset. They are designed to cause outrage but there is always more to the story conveniently left out.

But don’t worry she will probably just do what every other asylum applicant does when they get denied in Canada, enter the US illegally and start the process over again.

9 posted on 04/08/2009 12:24:58 PM PDT by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: usurper

The problem with your assertions are as follows.

1) The family has “honor killed” people before.

2) The death threats have arrived from out-of-country
and are in writing.

3) The threat is corraborated by multiple credible
bystanders.

4) The practice is common.

5) Because “honor killing” is a fundamental doctrinal practice of the jihad, protecting a woman from it
is a matter of defeating the jihad itself, not even just
saving the individual. Due to the West’s need to destroy
the jihad, great deference should be shown to those who
will not only abandon it, but who are essentially throwing
themselves on our mercy in fleeing from it.

6) If you are wrong, and she is murdered, your tune
would change. And it should.

7) Even if the claim were false, the fact that she is
publicly seeking asylum based on fleeing jihad, has
now made the claim true. The jihad would now want to
kill her just for making the claim of fleeing the
jihad. So even if any of your other cynicism were
correct, her very public committment to seeking
asylum in the “infidel” country, to protect her from
Muslim family, is grounds enough.

Conclusion. Saving this woman is a blow to the jihad and
a credit to the west. Ignoring her throws she, and others
like her, to the alligators.


11 posted on 04/20/2009 2:47:42 PM PDT by FarRockaway (despotic gerrymander: the aspiration of dhimmicrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson