Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPGuide

Actually I think technology would cause evolution to slow. We aren’t being wiped out by diseases the way we would be without medicines.

On the other hand I suppose easier lives could drive evolution in a different direction and not a good one.


2 posted on 04/08/2009 6:22:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

No, as population and mobility increases, so do the number genetic combinations.


4 posted on 04/08/2009 6:24:22 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Actually I think technology would cause evolution to slow. We aren’t being wiped out by diseases the way we would be without medicines.


Not only technology, but social policy. The fittest no longer reproduce the way they should. The least fit are subsidized to do so. I would not be surprised if we see reverse evolution.


18 posted on 04/08/2009 6:52:26 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson