Replies

To: Puppage; cpdiii

conversely,

if they attempted to “close the gunshow loophole”,

they would be outlawing the private sale of property from one individual to another.

That, in itself, is so not Constitutional.

57 posted on 04/10/2009 6:35:57 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)

To: MrB

if they attempted to “close the gunshow loophole”

How can they attempt to close something that doesn't even exist?

59 posted on 04/10/2009 6:41:28 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794