Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRESS RELEASE FROM PHILIP J. BERG RE: HOLLISTER (re: Soetoro/Obama)
Obamacrimes ^ | 4/9/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 04/10/2009 1:21:39 AM PDT by rxsid

PRESS RELEASE FROM PHILIP J. BERG RE: HOLLISTER

For Immediate Release: - 04/09/2009

For Further Information Contact:

Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659

philjberg@obamacrimes.com

Berg states Hollister case has been ‘Appealed’ as Opinion is so ‘outrageous’ and Sanction imposed was ‘totally unfair’ Judge showed his total bias since case was filed We will be successful on Appeal ! Spread the word !

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 04/09209) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of Constitutional "qualifications/eligibility" to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that an Appeal has been filed in the Hollister case for several reasons.

Judge James Robertson showed his bias from the time the case was filed: 1) Berg and Joyce filed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Judge Robertson stated he would hold in abeyance until we appeared in front of him ……….and then he would make a decision if we should be admitted…….; 2) Judge Robertson never scheduled a Hearing regarding our Motion Pro Hac Vice; 3) Judge Robertson was aware our local Washington, DC attorney, age 84, was not computer savvy; 4) Judge Robertson issued two [2] Orders, one [1] with two [2] days to respond and one [1] with one [1] day to respond, Motions that we responded to because others made us aware.

The decision by Judge Robertson in dismissing our case showed further his bias as he made statements that were totally untrue and no evidence thereof had been presented. Specifically, Judge Robertson stated how Obama’s citizenship has been “vetted, blogged, texted, twittered” during the two years of his campaign. This statement regarding Obama is so outrageous as Obama was never vetted or otherwise questioned.

Further, Judge Robertson keeps referring to Obama being “Native-born,” a new term in the efforts to justify Obama’s citizenship. The Constitution and all lawsuits attempting to discover the “truth” about Obama refer to the words in the Constitution, that being “Natural Born.”

Without testimony being presented, Judge Robertson decides our Interpleader case is “frivolous,” a decision that we completely differ with.

Judge Robertson refers to attorney Joyce and myself as “agents provocateurs.” I am honored by this designation because it shows that we are determined to expose the HOAX of Obama, the greatest HOAX upon the citizens of the United States in the history of our country, over 230 years.

The imposition of sanctions by way of a “Reprimand” to our local counsel, John D. Hemenway, Esquire was uncalled for and another attempt by Judge Robertson to stop the legitimate search for the truth about Obama’s citizenship. The following remarks by Margaret Calhoun Hemenway are right on point, “This is not a political issue – it is a legal issue and one of paramount national importance. Some question the wisdom of "undoing" an election if Obama's doubters are proven right. My father-in-law has lived through a World War, an actual impeachment and a President who was forced to resign under threat of impeachment – the nation survived, without chaos. The greatest danger to our freedom is disrespect for the Constitution and a President, who by his failure to provide evidence of his eligibility for the Presidency, evidently doesn't believe the rules should apply to him.”

Berg continued, “The Obama candidacy is the biggest "HOAX" perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established. Obama must be legally removed from office. I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' and we must make 75 million people aware. When people are made aware of the Obama 'HOAX,' that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally 'qualified/eligible' to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) 'Birth Certificate;' that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his 'adopted' name of 'Barry Soetoro' from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his office of President of the United States."

Berg concluded, "I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in 'our' U.S.A., for 'our' forefathers and for the tens of thousands of men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President."

The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama's lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President.

Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualifications].

As you know, I was the first to legally raise the issue - having filed my lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention

Status of Cases:

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Brief have been filed by all parties.
This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA
Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of "standing" by Philip J. Berg
This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court - where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case.
However, case is still alive in Third Circuit.
Oral argument is scheduled for the end of May 2009.

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254
This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall.
Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama - must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a constitutionally ineligible/unqualified "Usurper" President.
Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney.
Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to:

obamacrimes.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: akaobama; berg; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; hollister; ineligible; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; soetoro

1 posted on 04/10/2009 1:21:40 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Charge On!


2 posted on 04/10/2009 1:26:18 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
How many of these cases are still alive?

And then I just read that Alan Keyes is arranging a “million men “ march on DC. Together with the “tea parties” and the Tenth Amendment legislations in the State legislatures it sounds like the Good Ol’ USA is not going to give in to the “usurper” without a fight.

3 posted on 04/10/2009 1:33:12 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
"How many of these cases are still alive?"

I believe, technically, all of them as none of them have 'run the full course' of appeals, etc. Even Leo Donofrio stated that if he really wanted to pursue the matter, his case isn't a done deal as he never appealed the lower court rulling and SCOTUS mearly declined to hear the emergency stay requests.

4 posted on 04/10/2009 1:41:46 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void

PING

Please tell me Berg, or their local D.C. lawyer will bring up how this judge thinks the “court of public opinion” should suffice as the location for deciding on evidence in what could be the most important case in our Nation’s History...

I know there are a lot more legal terms one could use, and have used in this press release — just that it’s a good “sound bite” to get out there to the masses. Most decent citizens I think still believe our court system has problems, but is generally in “good shape”. This could wake them up in a jiffy — just this ONE decision.

Berg is right. This particular judge’s comments ARE outrageous. I wonder if he did this on PURPOSE to give them standing in a higher court so he could “pass the buck”. Surely, even a liberal judge isn’t this stupid, are they? (Wait, don’t answer that... I know the answer... LOL)

The first time I read about this decision it gobsmacked me... Now I wonder if this particular judge just wanted his name OUT of it!


5 posted on 04/10/2009 1:41:51 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

I have suspected this myself. He did not want to the be th one holding the hot potato (which will be an issue for alot of judges, especially ones wanting to be placed in a higher position by Obama), but didn’t want to throw it out completely because he knew there wasn’t a legal reason to.


6 posted on 04/10/2009 3:26:17 AM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson VIVA LA REVOLUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Love Mr. Berg. He is showing the same spirit that the liberals do. Keep on going and do not take NO for an answer. I only wish more of the right wing party had that much tenacity.


7 posted on 04/10/2009 3:56:34 AM PDT by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
I wonder if he did this on PURPOSE to give them standing in a higher court so he could “pass the buck”.

How would the judges standing grant the defendent standing that they didn't have before?

8 posted on 04/10/2009 4:03:47 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Judge Robertson was aware our local Washington, DC attorney, age 84, was not computer savvy;...

Lame! Written like a 5th grader.

My wife is a paralegal. It makes NO difference how inept or how old an attorney is to her. If she is employed by them, it is her responsibility to perform any legal or technical duties required to further a case. And...knowing her way around a computer is one of those duties.

9 posted on 04/10/2009 4:22:07 AM PDT by TexasRedeye (uickly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Americans have two choices.

We can cower in fear of being conspiracy theorists as these people dismantle America and shred the constitution. Or, we can stand tall and demand to know that Obama is legally able to hold office.

Those who think we will change anything in the next election are fooling themselves. The words and actions of the democrats are quite clear, they have no intent of EVER being a minority party again.


10 posted on 04/10/2009 4:24:57 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Acorn will ensure that the democrats never lose another election unless their fraud is exposed. The first step towards that goal must be exposing the candidate himself was a fraud from the start.

Then everything else will implode in a circular firing squad of finger pointing.


11 posted on 04/10/2009 4:30:11 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
It doesn't get much clearer than this.

Schumer: 'The Hard Right, Which Still Believes' in 'Traditional Values'...'All That Is Over.'
12 posted on 04/10/2009 4:34:44 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Because it’s a farcical “legal reason” to declare a case has no merit. It’s bold in it’s absolute disregard for common sense, much less any basis in LAW, or under ANY examination of process of law, or any POSSIBLE absolute credibility, could a judge — unless he needs to have charges filed against him and his license to practice law removed from him — possibly honestly rule that an issue of such importance as a Constitutional REQUIREMENT to insure the NATIONAL SECURITY of this Nation against HOSTILE enemies who would seek to destroy us from within (meaning those who completely and willfully disregard the rule of law, commit fraud upon the people as a whole, and systematically start imposing laws that fly in the FACE of the Constitution and destroy our country, and hurt our citizens)... Could POSSIBLY be “decided” in the court of public opinion. Especially when even the COPY of the Birth Certificate Obama DID provide he REFUSES to give to the courts to verify it’s authenticity. This judge took the word of the WEBMASTER of FACTCHECK, and a BLOGGER AT DAILY KOS, and TWITTERING, as his evidence in this case!

Therefore, he makes the decision SO outrageous that the appeals court basically HAS to listen to it and decide against him. In fact, Berg could probably argue that this judge needs to be relieved from making any more decisions on ANY case at all, frankly...

Maybe I’m totally wrong, but this seems too outrageous to be true... Then again, if you had told me yesterday that Obama had a Mad Scientist in the basement of the White House planning on sending up a rocket full of pollution to block the Sun’s light I probably would’ve thought you were crazy, too. :)


13 posted on 04/10/2009 4:41:46 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

For the record, If Hussein was born by C section, is that natural born?


14 posted on 04/10/2009 4:45:20 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Then again, if you had told me yesterday that Obama had a Mad Scientist in the basement of the White House planning on sending up a rocket full of pollution to block the Sun’s light I probably would’ve thought you were crazy, too. :)

LOL That right there is funny, I don't care who you are.
15 posted on 04/10/2009 4:46:49 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Thank you for that refreshing post. I have been begging the right to work together and organize to safe this country. In doing so, I’ve been called a collectivist, etc.

My only retort, before the Revolutionary War, Sam Adams and the “Sons of Liberty” along with others knew they had to have a “UNITED” front. Even with a rag tag army, the Colonist took a United Stand.

Until this type of Unity takes place and the righties are ever vigilant and resolute keeping a watch on the elected officials, groups like ACORN will continue to take elections for the left and gain control of our government. They are tenacious and the left never gives up.


16 posted on 04/10/2009 5:12:43 AM PDT by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Thanks. LOL
It’s funny ‘cause it’s true!!! heh heh
{well, that and it’s also scary....)


17 posted on 04/10/2009 5:40:53 AM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paige

should have been “SAVE” not safe - my apologies


18 posted on 04/10/2009 6:15:31 AM PDT by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bert

Shakespeare says no.


19 posted on 04/10/2009 7:46:45 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 81 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Amityschild; Calpernia; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; 21stCenturyFreeThinker; ...

ping


20 posted on 04/10/2009 7:47:44 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 81 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks.


21 posted on 04/10/2009 8:05:32 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra; cripplecreek

Exactly.


22 posted on 04/10/2009 8:28:42 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Therefore, he makes the decision SO outrageous that the appeals court basically HAS to listen to it and decide against him. In fact, Berg could probably argue that this judge needs to be relieved from making any more decisions on ANY case at all, frankly...

That doesn't change the merits of the case, or lack thereof. And it doesn't establish standing if there was none in the first place.

23 posted on 04/10/2009 8:38:52 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

There is a time limit for filing an appeal every step of the way. I haven’t really followed these case, so don’t know where Donofrio’s case is, but wherever it is, it’s on a clock.

I.e., if Donofrio’s case was denied at the District Court level, he’d have had 30 days to file at the Court of Appeals; if it was denied at the Court of Appeals, he’d have 90 days to file an appeal to SCOTUS. If an appeal isn’t filed on time, you are just outta luck.


24 posted on 04/10/2009 10:19:12 AM PDT by EDINVA ( A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
All citizens of this country have standing. What's the harm caused? (Pre 1/20) BO has failed to prove he's eligible for the office, coupled with (at least) circumstantial evidence that fraud has been committed. Our Constitution is directly harmed by a usurper.

This issue of 'nobody' has standing is a judicial fabrication. For example (post 1/20), BO signs a law that raises taxes...that 'harms' everyone who's tax burden is raised. One example, the ex CEO Wagner from GM has standing. He lost his job because of a WH policy. The handful of judges that this has gone before, have taken the easy way out by saying 'no standing' or that their court has 'no jurisdiction.'

What's the consequence for them "granting" standing (which we all have anyway)? They go down in the history books of the world as the judge/court that heard the case that brought down the usurper that the world (supposedly) loves. Perhaps even violence happens as a direct result of their 'judgement' for standing. Perhaps their life is in jeopardy. All very real possibilities. Now, what's the consequence for them to do nothing (i.e. "give" no standing)? Nothing, for them personally. Of course, our Constitution is usurped. Since they care none about the Constitution to begin with, it matter's none to them. Major difference in outcomes. It's a 'cop out' for this radioactive hot potato Constitutional crisis.

25 posted on 04/10/2009 11:45:32 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
"Love Mr. Berg. He is showing the same spirit that the liberals do. Keep on going and do not take NO for an answer. I only wish more of the right wing party had that much tenacity."

He sure does have tenacity, and thank goodness for it too. I believe, though, that he himself is a liberal Democrat.

26 posted on 04/10/2009 11:49:34 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
All citizens of this country have standing.

The courts apparently don't agree with you on that one.

27 posted on 04/10/2009 11:49:42 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye
"Lame! Written like a 5th grader. My wife is a paralegal. It makes NO difference how inept or how old an attorney is to her. If she is employed by them, it is her responsibility to perform any legal or technical duties required to further a case. And...knowing her way around a computer is one of those duties."

I believe this is simply a public statement, and not part of any documents that has been filed with the court. I'm not certain, but 1 or 2 days to respond to a court order doesn't sound "reasonable". Especially if the court hadn't granted access (prior to order) to the pacer system for their court.

28 posted on 04/10/2009 11:54:43 AM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Oh, it’s not ‘apparently’ it is that those few judges don’t agree period. Again, doesn’t mean they are right. IMO, it means they are scared.


29 posted on 04/10/2009 1:01:43 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Oh, it’s not ‘apparently’ it is that those few judges don’t agree period. Again, doesn’t mean they are right. IMO, it means they are scared.

So far as we know every judge who's been involved with the case has agreed that the plaintiffs lack standing. They're all cowards?

30 posted on 04/10/2009 1:08:11 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Without question, they are.


31 posted on 04/10/2009 1:21:34 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Without question, they are.

Of course they are.

32 posted on 04/10/2009 1:23:55 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Also, I am preparing to file a 4th case - Quo Warranto [challenge person in office - that does not meet the qualification

This time, he'd better make sure to file in the District Court of Washington DC.

33 posted on 04/10/2009 2:26:28 PM PDT by Polarik (("Forgeries don't validate claims -- they repudiate them"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
"This time, he'd better make sure to file in the District Court of Washington DC."

Isn't that where the Hollister case was filed, and thus the involvement of D.C. Attorney Hemenway?

34 posted on 04/10/2009 2:30:29 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; rxsid

But don’t miss the point: the “no standing” argument, rather than logical, is mostly arbitrary.

As illustrated in post # 25, it is an argument which itself has no standing—not by any logical principles of justice.


35 posted on 04/10/2009 3:11:08 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Liberals have neither the creativity nor the confidence to understand the truth of conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

obumpa


36 posted on 04/10/2009 4:43:44 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Spread the word I will!!


37 posted on 04/10/2009 5:13:58 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Ley’s just say that there’s not a 1 to 1 relationship between what Phil says he’s going to do and what he actually does.


38 posted on 04/10/2009 7:57:57 PM PDT by Polarik (("Forgeries don't validate claims -- they repudiate them"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

“Then everything else will implode in a circular firing squad of finger pointing.”

The very real problem is that most Americans, especially Black ones, don’t care about the constitution. Exposing him as a fraud won’t matter to them. The same way they supported O.J. Simpson in his first trial when they knew he was guilty as sin. It is all about race to them, and having a Black president and getting back at whitey. The only way they are going to be turned against Obama is for him to diss Blacks in a really bad way.

I’m sorry to say these things, but I am afraid they are so. He is this nation’s worst nightmare, and he is setting back race relations not advancing them.

Sorry if I seem off subject. I care that he might not be constitutionally qualified, but I have seen many blacks in uniform that don’t....that scares me. An upset of an Obama administration over him not be qualified will not set well with a significant minority that make up the armed forces. I don’t care about the general population, it is those bearing arms for the country that concern me. If we have a serious meltdown in the military over race, this republic is doomed.


39 posted on 04/11/2009 2:51:07 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Esquire?


40 posted on 04/11/2009 3:47:36 AM PDT by Rocky (OBAMA: Succeeding where bin Laden failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

So you don’t believe that they will accept this fraud as a major dis to them?

That someone who should not have run in the first place, took hundreds of millions of dollars from a community for his own bloated ego and then could not deliver on his promises can with a smile and some pigment get away with duping them and taking their money as well as taxing them to the tune of trillions of dollars to bail out essentially the government, the banks and big corporations?


41 posted on 04/11/2009 3:52:16 AM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Those who think we will change anything in the next election are fooling themselves. The words and actions of the democrats are quite clear, they have no intent of EVER being a minority party again.

You've got that right. It is high time for the fools amongst us to wise up and get real.

42 posted on 04/11/2009 6:22:57 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Berg concluded:

“I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the tens of thousands of men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution, with our legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified/eligible to be President.”

Hear! hear!

STE=Q


43 posted on 04/11/2009 10:15:08 AM PDT by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

“So you don’t believe that they will accept this fraud as a major dis to them?”

No, I am sad to say they won’t. They will see it as a “technicality” some “white racists” (meaning conservatives) cooked up to remove “their” president.

Do I mean we shouldn’t still expose the fraud? No, I think if he is constitutionally unqualified it should be revealed. However, the real damage to racial harmony will be years in the mending and will threaten the republic. All because of one ego maniac virus on the republic that I am calling “Barracks Ebola.”

America was ready for a Black president....why did it have to be one with so much baggage and so little common sense?


44 posted on 04/11/2009 10:34:49 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Hey is it true that Berg is suing the sainted Orley?


45 posted on 05/07/2009 7:53:04 AM PDT by nyconse (When you buy something, make an investment in your country. Buy Amrican or bye bye America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

I haven’t heard anything.


46 posted on 05/07/2009 7:56:43 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
That is true, and she is strangely quite about it, I wonder if she going to hire a lawyer to defend her
47 posted on 05/07/2009 8:00:33 AM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

I heard there was a post where it was mentioned but I have only seen it on lefty sites when I googled...not much help.


48 posted on 05/07/2009 8:43:30 AM PDT by nyconse (When you buy something, make an investment in your country. Buy Amrican or bye bye America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob; cripplecreek

Hey I found the filing...lots of legal talk...but boy is it interesting.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14978528/Taitz-Hale-Complaint-05-04-2009


49 posted on 05/07/2009 8:48:55 AM PDT by nyconse (When you buy something, make an investment in your country. Buy Amrican or bye bye America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson