Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Irked by Congressman's 'Socialist' Label; Ignores Double Standard
NewsBusters ^ | April 10, 2009 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 04/10/2009 11:20:03 AM PDT by Rufus2007

You could almost hear "How dare he!" being uttered by the left-wing establishment when Politico reported April 9 that a Republican congressman identified a specific number of "socialists" in the U.S. House of Representatives.

In a speech he gave at his home district, Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., the ranking Republican, Rep. Barney Frank's (D-Mass.) counterpart, on the House Banking Committee, said there were 17 socialists among him and his colleagues in the House.

Some in the media were also disturbed by Bachus' remarks and expressed dismay on MSNBC April 10. Emily Heil, a frequent guest on MSNBC and "Heard on the Hill" columnist for Roll Call, expressed her shock that Bachus would use "socialist" for a description of some members of Congress. MSNBC's Peter Alexander asked Heil what sort of backlash Bachus might face.

...more (w/video)...

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: msnbc; newsweek; socialism; spencerbachus
The reaction to my former congressman Spencer Bachus naming socialist in the House of Representatives from lefties seems way over the top...
1 posted on 04/10/2009 11:20:03 AM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

didn’t the Times cover read “We are all Socialists now?”

and the media is ticked at what exactly?
Socialism is what they have been pushing for decades.


2 posted on 04/10/2009 11:22:00 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Newsweek actually. Seems hypocritical, huh?


3 posted on 04/10/2009 11:22:29 AM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

My only problem with Bachus’s comment was the low number (17). Perhaps there are only 17 socialists in the true sense, but that still leaves a greater number of hardcore communists. For heaven’s sake, the Congressional Black Caucus has 14 members I believe, and off the top of my head there’s Waxman, DeLauro and Stark!


4 posted on 04/10/2009 11:26:58 AM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I guess the truth hurts,, A LOT


5 posted on 04/10/2009 11:28:01 AM PDT by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

we-ell, if it looks like a Socialist,

and it quacks like a Socialist,

it’s probably a... .


6 posted on 04/10/2009 11:28:27 AM PDT by hoe_cake (" 'We the people' tell the government what to do, it doesn't tell us." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Socialism in America...http://www.sovereignty.net/center/socialists.htm

Socialism in America

Socialism in America is alive, well, and growing. Aided by such influential Congressmen as John Conyers, Ranking Member of the House Judicial Committee, David Bonior, the pit-bull-dog who successfully whipped Newt, Maxine Waters, the President’s outspoken defender in the impeachment debates, and nearly 60 other Representatives, socialism is advancing in America behind the “Progressive” label. Here are a few excerpts taken directly from the web page of the Democratic Socialists of America. (Italicized emphasis provided)

“The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. DSA’s members are building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and politics.

“At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end. We are activists committed not only to extending political democracy but to demanding democratic empowerment in the economy, in gender relations, and in culture. Democracy is not simply one of our political values but our means of restructuring society. Our vision is of a society in which people have a real voice in the choices and relationships that affect the entirety of our lives. We call this vision democratic socialism - a vision of a more free, democratic and humane society.

We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo.

We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of resources, meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and racial equality, and non-oppressive relationships.”

Here is what “Liberty” looks like to a socialist:

“A democratic commitment to a vibrant pluralist life assumes the need for a democratic, responsive, and representative government to regulate the market, protect the environment, and ensure a basic level of equality and equity for each citizen. In the 21st century, such regulation will increasingly occur through international, multilateral action. But while a democratic state can protect individuals from domination by inordinately powerful, undemocratic transnational corporations, people develop the social bonds that render life meaningful only through cooperative, voluntary relationships. Promoting such bonds is the responsibility of socialists and the government alike.

“The social welfare programs of government have been for the most part positive, if partial, responses to the genuine social needs of the great majority of Americans. The dismantling of such programs by conservative and corporate elites in the absence of any alternatives will be disastrous. Abandoning schools, health care, and housing, for example, to the control of an unregulated free market magnifies the existing harsh realities of inequality and injustice.”

The action agenda posted on the socialists’ web site very closely parallels Agenda 21, and the recommendations of the President’s Council on Sustainable Development. The web site boasts the creation of the “Progressive Caucus” in Congress, as well as the coalition that is working to promote the socialist agenda in Congress.

Congressional Members of the
Progressive Caucus

Rep Earl Hilliard (AL-07)
Rep Eni Faleomavaega (AS-AL)
Rep Ed Pastor (AZ-02)
Rep Lynn C Woolsey (CA-06)
Rep George Miller (CA-07)
Rep Nancy Pelosi (CA-08)
Rep Fortney “Pete” Stark (CA-13)
Rep Henry A. Waxman (CA-29)
Rep Xavier Becerra (CA-30)
Rep Julian C. Dixon (CA-32)
Rep Esteban Edward Torres (CA-34)
Rep Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Rep George E. Brown (CA-42)
Rep Bob Filner (CA-50)
Rep Diane DeGette (CO-01)
Rep Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-AL)
Rep Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Rep Carrie P. Meek (FL-17)
Rep Alcee L. Hastings (FL-23)
Rep Cynthia A. McKinney (GA-04)
Rep John Lewis (GA-05)
Rep Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Rep Patsy Mink (HI-02)
Rep Jesse Jackson (IL-02)
Rep Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Rep Danny Davis (IL-07)
Rep Lane Evans (IL-17)
Rep Julia Carson (IN-10)
Rep John Olver (MA-01)
Rep Jim McGovern (MA-03)
Rep Barney Frank (MA-04)
Rep John Tierney (MA-06)
Rep David Bonior (MI-10)
Rep Lynn N. Rivers (MI-13)
Rep John Conyers (MI-14)
Rep Bennie G. Thompson (MS-02)
Rep Melvin L. Watt (NC-12)
Rep Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Rep Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Rep Major Owens (NY-11)
Rep Nydia M. Velazquez (NY-12)
Rep Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Rep Maurice Hinchey (NY-26)
Rep John LaFalce (NY-29)
Rep Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Rep Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
Rep Louis Stokes (OH-11)
Rep Sherrod Brown (OH-13)
Rep Elizabeth Furse (OR-01)
Rep Peter A. DeFazio (OR-04)
Rep Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Rep William Coyne (PA-14)
Rep Carlos A. Romero-Barcelo (PR-AL)
Rep Robert C. Scott (VA-03)
Rep Bernard Sanders (VT-AL)
Rep James A. McDermott (WA-07)

Progressive Coalition supporting socialist agenda

Americans for Democratic Action

Campaign for America’s Future

Campaign for New Priorities

Center for the Advancement of Public Policy

Center of Concern

Coalition on Human Needs

Demilitarization for Democracy

Development GAP

50 Years is Enough Network

Friends of the Earth

Fund for New Priorities in America

Institute for Policy Studies

Institute for Women’s Policy Research

International Labor Rights Fund

National Jobs for All Coalition

National Organization for Women

National Priorities Project

NETWORK: A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby

Peace Action

Preamble Center for Public Policy

Public Citizen, email: Public Citizen

Stakeholders Alliance

United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

United for a Fair Economy

Washington Chapter Alliance for Democracy

Working Assets

Women, Law and Development

National Council of La Raza

The Campaign for Health Security

Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

Friends Committee on National Legislation

Center for Defense Information

Council for a Livable World

Citizens for Tax Justice

U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines

Amnesty International

Human Rights Watch

Americans for a Sustainable Economy

National Education Association

USA Network for Habitat II

Catholic Charities

National Council of Negro Women

Center for Law and Social Policy

Witness for Peace

Children’s Defense Fund

Child Welfare League

National Black Child Development Institute

Urban League

Economic Policy Institute

Brookings Institute

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

Defenders of Wildlife

Veterans for Peace

National Rainbow Coalition

AFL-CIO

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

UNITE

Unitarian Universalist Service Committee

National Association of Public Hospitals

National Council of Senior Citizens

Long-Term Care Campaign

Consumer’s Union

Center for Responsive Politics

Latin American Working Group

Public Campaign

This particular coalition consists of social organizations that work hand-in-hand with other coalitions such as BIONET, CITNET, ECONET, PEACENET, the Climate Action Network (CAN), and others. All are connected through IGC-APC (Institute for Global Communications, and the Association of Progressive Communications). Virtually all of these organizations, including the Democratic Socialists of America, have web sites hosted by IGC-APC.

The policy gains that have been made in recent years on both the international and domestic fronts are largely the result of the communications capability of these organizations. Freedom.org was conceived more than five years ago to provide similar communications capability to organizations that are not socialists. The Property Rights Congress will be pioneering that new capability. Non-socialist organizations are far behind, and have much catching-up to do.


7 posted on 04/10/2009 11:28:33 AM PDT by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Good for Sen. Bachus. It’about time our GOP leaders start calling it as it is.


8 posted on 04/10/2009 11:29:26 AM PDT by Merlinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I would suggest to the media to explain exactly what “Socialism” is. How does socialism work? What is the effect of socialism on the people? How do you determine if socialism is being placed on the people? If the shoe fits, wear it.


9 posted on 04/10/2009 11:31:21 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Jon Meacham and Evan Thomas on Why "We Are All Socialists Now"

NEW YORK, Feb. 8 /PRNewswire/ -- "Whether we want to admit it or not the America of 2009 is moving toward a modern European state," Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Editor-at-Large Evan Thomas write in an essay opening the February 16 Newsweek cover package, "We Are All Socialists Now" (on newsstands Monday, February 9).

Emily Heil, a frequent guest on MSNBC and "Heard on the Hill" columnist for Roll Call, expressed her shock that Bachus would use "socialist" for a description of some members of Congress.

Well Emily, your "shock" appears to be as phony as Hussein Øbama's "birth certificate."

10 posted on 04/10/2009 11:34:30 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I think he was being too nice by just referring to them as socialists. I would have started by applying numerous unflattering adjectives.


11 posted on 04/10/2009 11:47:09 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Leave no authority existing not responsible to the people ----- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: givemELL

They are organization-mad!! Leftist organizations spawn and breed like kudzu.


12 posted on 04/10/2009 11:53:58 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Rufus2007

what sort of backlash Bachus might face..

Whining from the liberal double standard media, praise from everyone in his district and living in the real world!


14 posted on 04/10/2009 12:16:20 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Obama yo 'mama', Uncle Sam yo 'baby daddy'!; (The new cry of the Obama generation)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

GOOD FOR HIM!

He is speaking the truth-well,almost. There are more than 17!

These vampires don’t want to be dragged into the light.

Now we need other Congressman on the right to come out and echo him.

Will they do it?

Will the “Republicans” come to his defense for stating the truth and calling a spade a spade?

I certainly hope so.

This will damage the left and they should call it what it is for the sake of our Republic.

They’re AT LEAST socialist!

But I think the “nice-guy” lame-*ss conservatives will likely win-out and ONCE AGAIN do NOTHING.

What happened to: “If it quacks like a duck...”?

What happened to plain ol’ common sense?

Are these people acting like socialists most of the time?

HELLO?!

Then they must be socialists—call them out!

Put pressure on them.

Let them claim the label or change their ways.

Fight them!


15 posted on 04/10/2009 12:55:54 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

HERE’S THE STARTING POINT:

http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/gov_philosophy/dsa_members.htm

These were membere of the Democratic Socialists of America a few years ago

www.dsa.usa.org

Dumb ass media doesn’t know squat.


16 posted on 04/10/2009 12:57:14 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Ayers Lied, People Died. No Justice, No Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

17 socialists,
234 dumb asses
nearly all crooked lawyers
and none worth a pile of donkey turds.


17 posted on 04/10/2009 2:20:54 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLI

18 posted on 04/11/2009 8:45:41 PM PDT by Cyberrat (Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson