Thailand needs to revert back to a military dictatorship. Thailand is proof that not all countries are mature enough to handle the responsibilities that go along with democracy.
Forgive me for being totally ignorant on this situation, but can someone explain really quickly “Who are the good guys?”, and “What is the bad guys’ real problems?”.
Lately, I’m loathe to read a news article without trying to read between the lines, and I don’t know enough about this conflict to understand it! Someone has to be upset about something here to want the bloodbath you speak of...
Are the “Blue Shirts” who sound like the aggressors in the article like Communists, or Muslims, or Anarchists, what kind of “protest” was this? And the Red Shirts — they were just “regular citizens” who were protecting the building? “protesting” against the Blue shirts???
It sounds like the reporter was giving us a play by play of a sporting event. This doesn’t sound like a “protest” either, it sounds more like a “rumble”...
Thanks if you can help me figure this out! :)
aw, somebody had to say it....
Emergency laws in Pattaya lifted : PM
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/breakingnews/30100294/Emergency-laws-in-Pattaya-lifted—PM
Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva said the government decided to lift the emergency law in Pattaya after all leaders of the Asean Summit left the country safely.
The decision came after the law is imposed six hours ago after the red shirted protesters broke into the press hall of the Asean Summit in Pattaya.
Speaking in a press conference at the press centre in Pattaya at about 7.15pm. The laws were imposed 1.30pm.
So, as I understand it, an American analogy would be Conservatives in Red Shirts and Acorn disrupters in blue shirts just the opposite of the Thais.
The code pinkos are shirts of a different color and the purple shirts shout for moderation