Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger
I support the tea parties but I also know that sometimes you only get one good shot. If it's not good it makes recreating it later several times harder.

If a movement doesn't define itself in easy to understand terms early on and then stay on message and pound it home every chance they get, they in effect leave a blank slate that allows your opponents to write it for you.

It's harder for conservatives since our opponents own the MSM. Give them any kind of daylight and they will run with it until they drive you into irrelevance. We're seeing that now in the articles and columns stating the message is unclear. Once they get label to stick then it will be on to Sullivan's tactic, calling it a childish tantrum.

Does “tantrum” remind you of something? It was word Dan Rather used to describe Reagans election victory in 1980.

Some things never change.

162 posted on 04/11/2009 9:52:09 AM PDT by Bob J ("For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at it's root.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Bob J
Does “tantrum” remind you of something? It was word Dan Rather used to describe Reagans election victory in 1980.

And on the heels of Carter, no less! What else are you supposed to have when someone puts a stick in your eye?

*****

PR? Marketing? Sociology?

168 posted on 04/11/2009 10:08:49 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson