My interest is in the subject of the posted article, Art as Propaganda for Evolution.
If you’d like to join in instead of vague efforts to make the article about religious images (”Do you have the same objections to religious imagery?), etc., why, just go ahead.
I’m just trying to figure out what the difference between an artist’s rendering of a dinosaur and one of something like Noah’s Ark that make’s one “deceptive propaganda” and the other not. Your explanation is about as clear as mud.